ArticleTrends in hearing
Decision-Making in Audiology: Balancing Evidence-Based Practice and Patient-Centered Care.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Audiologist Decision-Making: Hearing Aid Technology Levels and Auditory Ecology.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2026Article
- Perspectives of audiologists in China on artificial intelligence in clinical practice and professional identity: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Types of Evidence Synthesis Beyond Systematic Reviews in Evidence-Based Practice Publications in Audiology Research: A Tutorial.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2026Article
- Alignment of Audiologists' Values With Best-Practice Standards: Insights From a National Survey.American journal of audiology · 2024Article
- Person-centered care: preferences and predictors in speech-language pathology and audiology practitioners.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Shared decision making: audiology student perspectives.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2023Article
- Implementation Science: Increasing the Public Health Impact of Audiology Research.American journal of audiology · 2022Review
- Audiologists' presbycusis and associated tinnitus counselling practices within the KwaZulu-Natal province.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2022Article
- Audiologist's Perspective in Auditory Rehabilitation: Implications for Ethical Conduct and Decision-Making in Portugal.Audiology research · 2022Article
- Listening-Based Communication Ability in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Comments on nutritional recommendations for CoVID-19 quarantine.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2021Article
- The Evidence-Based Practice Silent Enemy: Retracted Articles and Their Use in Systematic Reviews.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Developing Foundational Counseling Skills for Addressing Adherence Issues in Auditory Rehabilitation.Seminars in hearing · 2018Review
- Article
- Introducing the Australian Hearing Hub.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health-care service delivery models have evolved from a practitioner-centered approach toward a patient-centered ideal. Concurrently, increasing emphasis has been placed on the use of empirical evidence in decision-making to increase clinical accountability. The way in which clinicians use empirical evidence and client preferences to inform decision-making provides an insight into health-care delivery models utilized in clinical practice. The present study aimed to investigate the sources of information audiologists use when discussing rehabilitation choices with clients, and discuss the findings within the context of evidence-based practice and patient-centered care. To assess the changes that may have occurred over time, this study uses a questionnaire based on one of the few studies of decision-making behavior in audiologists, published in 1989. The present questionnaire was completed by 96 audiologists who attended the World Congress of Audiology in 2014. The responses were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative approaches. Results suggest that audiologists rank clinical test results and client preferences as the most important factors for decision-making. Discussion with colleagues or experts was also frequently reported as an important source influencing decision-making. Approximately 20% of audiologists mentioned utilizing research evidence to inform decision-making when no clear solution was available. Information shared at conferences was ranked low in terms of importance and reliability. This study highlights an increase in awareness of concepts associated with evidence-based practice and patient-centered care within audiology settings, consistent with current research-to-practice dissemination pathways. It also highlights that these pathways may not be sufficient for an effective clinical implementation of these practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.