SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2018
Extent, quality and impact of patient and public involvement in antimicrobial drug development research: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient satisfaction with infection prevention and control interventions in acute hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews.Health research policy and systems · 2021Pooled it
- Extent, quality and impact of patient and public involvement in antimicrobial drug development research: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Pooled it
- Perspectives of researchers and clinicians on patient and public involvement (PPI) in preclinical spinal cord research: An interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Applying Patient and Public Involvement in preclinical research: A co-created scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Impact of patient and public (PPI) involvement in the Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis (LAPCD) study: a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Practices of patient engagement in drug development: a systematic scoping review.Research involvement and engagement · 2022Article
- A Systematic Review of Patient Engagement Experiences in Brain Disorders.Patient related outcome measures · 2022Review
- Optimising Multi-stakeholder Practices in Patient Engagement: A Gap Analysis to Enable Focused Evolution of Patient Engagement in the Development and Lifecycle Management of Medicines.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2021Article
- Identification and Reporting of Patient and Public Partner Authorship on Knowledge Syntheses: Rapid Review.Journal of participatory medicine · 2021Review
- Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in preclinical research: A scoping review protocol.HRB open research · 2021Article
- Evaluating the "return on patient engagement initiatives" in medicines research and development: A literature review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Review
- Involving Patient Groups in Drug Research: A Systematic Review of Reasons.Patient preference and adherence · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly recognized as bringing a range of benefits to clinical and health services research. Recent systematic reviews have identified and synthesized many benefits (eg higher recruitment rates) and some costs (eg extra time need). Much of the literature focuses on PPI in long-term conditions rather than more acute health care in which the majority of microbiological research is undertaken.
objectivesThe aim was to identify the extent, quality and impact of PPI in antimicrobial drug development research. Objectives were to identify any relevant reporting of PPI in antimicrobial research; appraise the quality of reporting on PPI using recognized PPI reporting and critical appraisal tools; and extract and synthesize data on the impact of PPI. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic review was undertaken with a search strategy based on four word groups (PPI, patients, antimicrobial drug development and outcomes). Eight online databases were searched. INCLUSION CRITERIA: English language publication, publication between 1996 and 2016 and studies describing PPI in antimicrobial drug development research. MAIN
resultsNo studies were found through online searching that met the search strategy and inclusion criteria. One relevant protocol paper with a brief mention of PPI was identified through expert recommendation. Commentary papers recommending PPI were identified through website searching and expert opinion. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsDespite strong policy guidance encouraging PPI at the international and national levels, and anecdotal accounts of PPI taking place, evidence for the extent, quality and impact of PPI in antimicrobial drug development research has not yet appeared in the peer-reviewed literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.