Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28752498›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017

Pseudoprogression in pediatric low-grade glioma after irradiation.

Derek S Tsang, Erin S Murphy, John T Lucas, Pagona Lagiou, Sahaja Acharya, Thomas E Merchant

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pseudoprogression in low-grade glioma.Translational cancer research · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Derek S TsangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, MS 210, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9762-6901
Erin S MurphyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
John T LucasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, MS 210, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.
Pagona LagiouDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Sahaja AcharyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, MS 210, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.
Thomas E MerchantDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, MS 210, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA. thomas.merchant@stjude.org.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the incidence and management of pseudoprogression after radiation therapy (RT) in patients with pediatric low-grade glioma (LGG). This retrospective review included patients aged 21 years or younger with intracranial LGG treated with curative-intent RT. Pseudoprogression was defined as an increase in tumor size by ≥10% in at least two dimensions between two and three consecutive MR imaging studies. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were measured from the first day of RT. EFS was defined as survival without true progression or secondary high-grade glioma. Sixty-two of 221 patients developed pseudoprogression, with a 10-year cumulative incidence of 29.0% (95% CI 23.0-35.2). Median time to pseudoprogression was 6.1 months after RT. Symptomatic pseudoprogression was managed with subtotal resection, shunt/Ommaya reservoir placement, or corticosteroids in 11 (18%), 7 (11%), and 2 patients (3%), respectively. The remaining tumors were observed (68%). Patients with pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) had 5.4-fold greater odds of developing pseudoprogression relative to tumors of other histology (odds ratio 95% CI 2.5-11.4, P < 0.0001). Among patients with PA (n = 127), the 10-year cumulative incidence of pseudoprogression was 42.9%. In this group, pseudoprogression was associated with improved 10-year EFS (84.5% vs. 58.5%, P = 0.008) and OS (98.0% vs. 91.2%, P = 0.03). Pseudoprogression after irradiation was common, especially in patients with pilocytic astrocytoma, and was associated with improved survival. Knowledge of the incidence and temporal course of pseudoprogression may help avoid unnecessary salvage therapy.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentBrainBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolDisease ManagementDisease ProgressionFemaleGliomaHumansIncidenceInfantMaleNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesGliomaMagnetic resonance imagingPediatricsPseudoprogressionRadiationRadiation effects

Identifiers

PMID28752498
PMCPMC8717050
OpenAlexW2741628307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.