Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28752473›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2017

Safety Profile of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Add-On Therapy in Adults with Refractory Focal-Onset Seizures: From Clinical Studies to 6 Years of Post-Marketing Experience.

Helena Gama, Mariana Vieira, Raquel Costa, Joana Graça, Luís M Magalhães, Patrício Soares-da-Silva

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helena GamaDepartment of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal. helena.gama@bial.com.
Mariana VieiraDepartment of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
Raquel CostaDepartment of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
Joana GraçaDepartment of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
Luís M MagalhãesDepartment of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
Patrício Soares-da-SilvaDepartment of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
Bial (Portugal) · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEslicarbazepine acetate was first approved in the European Union in 2009 as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to review the safety profile of eslicarbazepine acetate analyzing the data from several clinical studies to 6 years of post-marketing surveillance.

methodsWe used a post-hoc pooled safety analysis of four phase III, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies (BIA-2093-301, -302, -303, -304) of eslicarbazepine acetate as add-on therapy in adults. Safety data of eslicarbazepine acetate in special populations of patients aged ≥65 years with partial-onset seizures (BIA-2093-401) and subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (BIA-2093-111) and renal impairment (BIA-2093-112) are also considered. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation, and serious adverse events were analyzed. The global safety database of eslicarbazepine acetate was analyzed for all cases from post-marketing surveillance from 1 October, 2009 to 21 October, 2015.

resultsFrom a pooled analysis of four phase III studies, it was concluded that the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation, and adverse drug reactions were dose dependent. Dizziness, somnolence, headache, and nausea were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥10% of patients) and the majority were of mild-to-moderate intensity. No dose-dependent trend was observed for serious adverse events and individual serious adverse events were reported in less than 1% of patients. Hyponatremia was classified as a possibly related treatment-emergent adverse event in phase III studies (1.2%); however, after 6 years of post-marketing surveillance it represents the most frequently (10.2%) reported adverse drug reaction, with more than half of these cases occurring with eslicarbazepine acetate at daily doses of 1200 mg. Other adverse drug reactions reported in post-marketing surveillance are seizure (5.8%), dizziness (4.1%), rash (2.6%), and fatigue (2.1%). The safety profile of eslicarbazepine acetate in renal and hepatic impairment subjects (phase I studies) and in elderly patients (phase III study) did not raise any specific concern.

conclusionAfter 6 years of post-marketing surveillance, eslicarbazepine acetate maintains a similar safety profile to that observed in pivotal clinical studies.

Indexed as

AdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAnticonvulsantsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDibenzazepinesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEuropeFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSafetySeizuresAnticonvulsantsDibenzazepineseslicarbazepine acetate

Identifiers

PMID28752473
PMCPMC5688182
OpenAlexW2741763767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.