Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28752277›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2017

Myocardial Tissue Engineering for Regenerative Applications.

Buntaro Fujita, Wolfram-Hubertus Zimmermann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 3D Printing Approaches to Engineer Cardiac Tissue.Current cardiology reports · 2023
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for studying energy metabolism.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2020
    Review
  7. Bioreactor Platform for Biomimetic Culture andFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Buntaro FujitaInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Wolfram-Hubertus ZimmermannInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. w.zimmermann@med.uni-goettingen.de.

Funding

Progenitor Cell Biology Consortium Administrative Coordinating CenterU01HL099997 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI TERRIN, MICHAEL L · 2009 to 2015
$29.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review provides an overview of the current state of tissue-engineered heart repair with a special focus on the anticipated modes of action of tissue-engineered therapy candidates and particular implications as to transplant immunology. RECENT

findingsMyocardial tissue engineering technologies have made tremendous advances in recent years. Numerous different strategies are under investigation and have reached different stages on their way to clinical translation. Studies in animal models demonstrated that heart repair requires either remuscularization by delivery of bona fide cardiomyocytes or paracrine support for the activation of endogenous repair mechanisms. Tissue engineering approaches result in enhanced cardiomyocyte retention and sustained remuscularization, but may also be explored for targeted paracrine or mechanical support. Some of the more advanced tissue engineering approaches are already tested clinically; others are at late stages of pre-clinical development. Process optimization towards cGMP compatibility and clinical scalability of contractile engineered human myocardium is an essential step towards clinical translation. Long-term allograft retention can be achieved under immune suppression. HLA matching may be an option to enhance graft retention and reduce the need for comprehensive immune suppression. Tissue-engineered heart repair is entering the clinical stage of the translational pipeline. Like in any effective therapy, side effects must be anticipated and carefully controlled. Allograft implantation under immune suppression is the most likely clinical scenario. Strategies to overcome transplant rejection are evolving and may further boost the clinical acceptance of tissue-engineered heart repair.

Indexed as

MyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacAnimalsHeart FailureHumansTissue EngineeringEngineered heart muscleHeart failurePluripotent stem cellsRegenerationRemuscularizationTissue engineeringTransplant immunology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.