ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2017
Myocardial Tissue Engineering for Regenerative Applications.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D Printing Approaches to Engineer Cardiac Tissue.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Prospect of 3D bioprinting over cardiac cell therapy and conventional tissue engineering in the treatment of COVID-19 patients with myocardial injury.Regenerative therapy · 2021Review
- Engineering Human Cardiac Muscle Patch Constructs for Prevention of Post-infarction LV Remodeling.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Repositioning Natural Antioxidants for Therapeutic Applications in Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Delta-1 Functionalized Hydrogel Promotes hESC-Cardiomyocyte Graft Proliferation and Maintains Heart Function Post-Injury.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020Article
- Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for studying energy metabolism.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2020Review
- Bioreactor Platform for Biomimetic Culture andFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Decellularized Human Dermal Matrix as a Biological Scaffold for Cardiac Repair and Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Biomimetic cardiovascular platforms for in vitro disease modeling and therapeutic validation.Biomaterials · 2019Review
- Article
- Concise Review: The Regenerative Journey of Pericytes Toward Clinical Translation.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2018Review
- Cardiomyocyte-Endothelial Cell Interactions in Cardiac Remodeling and Regeneration.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review provides an overview of the current state of tissue-engineered heart repair with a special focus on the anticipated modes of action of tissue-engineered therapy candidates and particular implications as to transplant immunology. RECENT
findingsMyocardial tissue engineering technologies have made tremendous advances in recent years. Numerous different strategies are under investigation and have reached different stages on their way to clinical translation. Studies in animal models demonstrated that heart repair requires either remuscularization by delivery of bona fide cardiomyocytes or paracrine support for the activation of endogenous repair mechanisms. Tissue engineering approaches result in enhanced cardiomyocyte retention and sustained remuscularization, but may also be explored for targeted paracrine or mechanical support. Some of the more advanced tissue engineering approaches are already tested clinically; others are at late stages of pre-clinical development. Process optimization towards cGMP compatibility and clinical scalability of contractile engineered human myocardium is an essential step towards clinical translation. Long-term allograft retention can be achieved under immune suppression. HLA matching may be an option to enhance graft retention and reduce the need for comprehensive immune suppression. Tissue-engineered heart repair is entering the clinical stage of the translational pipeline. Like in any effective therapy, side effects must be anticipated and carefully controlled. Allograft implantation under immune suppression is the most likely clinical scenario. Strategies to overcome transplant rejection are evolving and may further boost the clinical acceptance of tissue-engineered heart repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28752277What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.