ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2017
Transcriptional Profiling of
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral microbiome profiling of primary oral candidiasis during infection and post-antifungal therapy.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Review
- Integrative Transkingdom Analysis of the Gut Microbiome in Antibiotic Perturbation and Critical Illness.mSystems · 2021Article
- Review
- Article
- Nanosilver/poly (dl-lactic-co-glycolic acid) on titanium implant surfaces for the enhancement of antibacterial properties and osteoinductivity.International journal of nanomedicine · 2019Article
- Candida Interactions with the Oral Bacterial Microbiota.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Article
- Transcriptional Profiling of Host Cell Responses to VirulentInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Coassociation between Group B Streptococcus and Candida albicans Promotes Interactions with Vaginal Epithelium.Infection and immunity · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Biofilms on silicone rubber voice prostheses are the major cause for frequent failure and replacement of these devices. The presence of both bacterial and yeast strains has been suggested to be crucial for the development of voice prosthetic biofilms. Polymicrobial biofilms that include
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.