Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28752002›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2017

Changing Definitions of Sepsis.

Fethi Gül, Mustafa Kemal Arslantaş, İsmail Cinel, Anand Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Healthcare costs after sepsis: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Norepinephrine in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Microbe on the move:Journal of bacteriology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. NETosis and pyroptosis of immune cells in sepsis.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fethi GülDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Mustafa Kemal ArslantaşDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
İsmail CinelDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Marmara University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Anand KumarUniversity of Manitoba, Medical Microbiology and Pharmacology, Sections of Critical Care Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients despite the use of modern antibiotics and resuscitation therapies. Outcomes in sepsis have improved overall, probably because of an enhanced focus on early diagnosis and other improvements in supportive care, but mortality rates still remain unacceptably high. The diagnosis and definition of sepsis is a critical problem due to the heterogeneity of this disease process. Although it is apparent that much more needs to be done to advance our understanding, sepsis and related terms remain difficult to define. A 1991 consensus conference developed initial definitions that systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) to infection would be called sepsis. Definitions of sepsis and septic shock were revised in 2001 to incorporate the threshold values for organ damage. In early 2016, the new definitions of sepsis and septic shock have changed dramatically. Sepsis is now defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. The consensus document describes organ dysfunction as an acute increase in total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score two points consequently to the infection. A significant change in the new definitions is the elimination of any mention of SIRS. The Sepsis-3 Task Force also introduced a new bedside index, called the qSOFA, to identify outside of critical care units patients with suspected infection who are likely to develop sepsis. Recently updated the consensus definitions improved specificity compared with the previous descriptions.

Indexed as

definitionsSepsisseptic shockSIRS

Identifiers

PMID28752002
PMCPMC5512390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.