Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28751982›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2017

Clinical Features and Treatments of Syphilitic Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ting Zhang, Ying Zhu, Gezhi Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Putative mechanisms of ocular inflammation in syphilis.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Syphilitic Uveitis: Clinical Features, Treatment, and Outcome.The American journal of case reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Diagnosis and treatment of syphilitic uveitis: Taiwan experts consensus.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Monocular syphilitic uveitis.BMJ case reports · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ting ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Nose Throat Hospital, Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai 200031, China.
Ying ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiang Ya Road, Changsha 410008, China.
Gezhi XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Nose Throat Hospital, Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai 200031, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9341-4952
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the clinical features and efficacies of treatments for syphilitic uveitis.

methodsPubMed was searched for studies of syphilitic uveitis published between January 1990 and October 2016. The clinical features were summarized and appraised. The pooled success rate was defined as an improved or maintained final visual acuity and was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were assessed.

resultsThirty-two studies involving 670 patients were analyzed. The most common type of syphilitic uveitis was papillitis. The pooled success rate was 0.91 (95% CI 0.84-0.97) for antibacterial agents alone (15 studies, 286 patients); 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.98) for antibacterial agents and systemic corticosteroids combined (11 studies, 245 patients); and 0.91 (95% CI 0.80-0.98) for antibacterial agents, systemic corticosteroids, and other immunosuppressants combined (3 studies, 73 patients). Subgroup analyses revealed no correlations of the efficacy of antibacterial agent monotherapy with study characteristics, such as human immunodeficiency virus coinfection status.

conclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis revealed the efficacy of antibacterial agents for treating syphilitic uveitis. Coadministration of systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants did not elicit further improvements in the clinical outcomes of antibacterial agents.

Identifiers

PMID28751982
PMCPMC5511639
OpenAlexW2726332547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.