Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28751843›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2017

ANMCO-SIMEU Consensus Document: in-hospital management of patients presenting with chest pain.

Guerrino Zuin, Vito Maurizio Parato, Paolo Groff, Michele Massimo Gulizia, Andrea Di Lenarda, Matteo Cassin, Gian Alfonso Cibinel, Maurizio Del Pinto, Giuseppe Di Tano, Federico Nardi and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Guerrino ZuinCardiology Unit, Ospedale dell'Angelo, Mestre, Via Paccagnella, 11 30174 VE, Italy.
Vito Maurizio ParatoCardiology Rehabilitation, Ospedale Madonna del Soccorso, Cardiology Unit, ASUR Marche/AV5-Madonna del Soccorso Hospital, 4-7, via Luciano Manara, 63074, San Benedetto del Tronto (Ascoli Piceno), Italy.
Paolo GroffEmergency Department, Ospedale Madonna del Soccorso, San Benedetto del Tronto (Ascoli Piceno), Italy.
Michele Massimo GuliziaCardiology Department, Ospedale Garibaldi-Nesima, Azienda di Rilievo Nazionale e Alta Specializzazione "Garibaldi", Catania, Italy.
Andrea Di LenardaCardiovascular Center, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, Trieste, Italy.
Matteo CassinCardiology Department, A.O. Santa Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy.
Gian Alfonso CibinelEmergency Department, Azienda Ospedaliera di Pinerolo (TO), Italy.
Maurizio Del PintoEmergency Department, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Giuseppe Di TanoCardiology Unit, Ospedale ASST, Cremona, Italy.
Federico NardiCardiology Department, Ospedale Castelli, Verbania, Italy.
Roberta RossiniCardiovascular Department, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Maria Pia RuggieriEmergency-Admission Department, A.O. San Giovanni-Addolorata, Rome, Italy.
Enrico RuggieroEmergency Department, Ospedale San Paolo, Napoli, Italy.
Fortunato Scotto di UccioCCU-Cardiolgy Department, Ospedale di Loreto Mare, Loreto Mare (Naples), Italy.
Serafina ValenteIntensive Integrated Cardiology Department, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Degli Angeli · ITAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste · ITHumanitas Castelli · ITIstituti Ospitalieri di Cremona · ITOspedale dell' Angelo · ITOspedale Garibaldi · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITOspedale Santa Maria di Loreto Nuovo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chest pain is a common general practice presentation that requires careful diagnostic assessment because of its diverse and potentially serious causes. However, the evaluation of acute chest pain remains challenging, despite many new insights over the past two decades. The percentage of patients presenting to the emergency departments because of acute chest pain appears to be increasing. Nowadays, there are two essential chest pain-related issues: (i) the missed diagnoses of acute coronary syndromes with a poor short-term prognosis; and (ii) the increasing percentage of hospitalizations of low-risk cases. It is well known that hospitalization of a low-risk chest pain patient can lead to unnecessary tests and procedures, with an increasing trend of complications and burden of costs. Therefore, the significantly reduced financial resources of healthcare systems induce physicians and administrators to improve the efficiency of care protocols for patients with acute chest pain. Despite the efforts of the Scientific Societies in producing statements on this topic, in Italy there is still a significant difference between emergency physicians and cardiologists in managing patients with chest pain. For this reason, the aim of the present consensus document is double: first, to review the evidence-based efficacy and utility of various diagnostic tools, and, second, to delineate the critical pathways (describing key steps) that need to be implemented in order to standardize the management of chest pain patients, making a correct diagnosis and treatment as uniform as possible across the entire country.

Indexed as

Acute coronary syndromesChest painDifferential diagnosisEmergency department

Identifiers

PMID28751843
PMCPMC5520764
OpenAlexW2616856666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.