Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28751654›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Pro-106-Ser mutation and EPSPS overexpression acting together simultaneously in glyphosate-resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica).

Javid Gherekhloo, Pablo T Fernández-Moreno, Ricardo Alcántara-de la Cruz, Eduardo Sánchez-González, Hugo E Cruz-Hipolito, José A Domínguez-Valenzuela, Rafael De Prado

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Distribution of Glyphosate-Resistance inFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Plant physiology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Javid GherekhlooDepartment of Agronomy, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 49189-43464, Gorgan, Iran.
Pablo T Fernández-MorenoDepartment of Agricultural Chemistry and Edaphology, Campus of Rabanales, University of Cordoba, 14071, Cordoba, Spain.
Ricardo Alcántara-de la CruzDepartamento de Entomologia/BIOAGRO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-900, Viçosa, Brazil. ricardo.la@ufv.br.ORCID 0000-0001-6302-0947
Eduardo Sánchez-GonzálezDepartment of Agricultural Parasitology, Chapingo Autonomous University, 56230, Texcoco, Mexico.
Hugo E Cruz-HipolitoBayer CropScience Mexico, 11520, Mexico City, Mexico.
José A Domínguez-ValenzuelaDepartment of Agricultural Parasitology, Chapingo Autonomous University, 56230, Texcoco, Mexico. jose_dv001@yahoo.com.mx.
Rafael De PradoDepartment of Agricultural Chemistry and Edaphology, Campus of Rabanales, University of Cordoba, 14071, Cordoba, Spain.
Chapingo Autonomous University · MXUniversity of Córdoba · ESBayer (Mexico) · MXGorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources · IRUniversidade Federal de Viçosa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glyphosate has been used for more than 15 years for weed management in citrus groves in the Gulf of Mexico, at up to 3-4 applications per year. Goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.) control has sometimes failed. In this research, the mechanisms governing three goosegrass biotypes (Ein-Or from an orange grove, and Ein-Pl1 and Ein-Pl2 from Persian lime groves) with suspected resistance to glyphosate were characterized and compared to a susceptible biotype (Ein-S). Dose-response and shikimate accumulation assays confirmed resistance of the resistant (R) biotypes. There were no differences in glyphosate absorption, but the R biotypes retained up to 62-78% of the herbicide in the treated leaf at 96 h after treatment (HAT), in comparison to the Ein-S biotype (36%). The 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) activity in the Ein-Or and Ein-S biotypes was over 100-fold lower than the Ein-Pl1 and Ein-Pl2 ones. The latter showed a high EPSPS-basal activity, a mutation at Pro-106-Ser position in the EPSPS gene, and EPSPS overexpression. The EPSPS basal and EPSPS overexpression were positively correlated. The R goosegrass biotypes displayed poor glyphosate translocation. Furthermore, this grassweed showed, for the first time, two mechanisms at the target-site level (Pro-106-Ser mutation + EPSPS overexpression) acting together simultaneously against glyphosate.

Indexed as

3-Phosphoshikimate 1-CarboxyvinyltransferaseBase SequenceCarbon IsotopesEleusineGene Expression Regulation, PlantGlycineGlyphosateHerbicide ResistanceMutationShikimic Acid3-Phosphoshikimate 1-CarboxyvinyltransferaseCarbon IsotopesGlycineGlyphosateShikimic Acid

Identifiers

PMID28751654
PMCPMC5532362
OpenAlexW2738371446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.