Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28751515›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Concordance of Time-of-Flight MRA and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Adult Primary Central Nervous System Vasculitis.

H de Boysson, G Boulouis, J-J Parienti, E Touzé, M Zuber, C Arquizan, N Dequatre, O Detante, B Bienvenu, A Aouba and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

H de BoyssonFrom the Departments of Internal Medicine (H.d.B., B.B., A.A.) deboysson-h@chu-caen.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9083-8365
G BoulouisDepartment of Neuroradiology (G.B., O.N.), Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Université Paris-Descartes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unite Mixte de Recherche 894, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8422-9205
J-J ParientiBiostatistics and Clinical Research Unit (J.-J.P.), Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-5590
E TouzéNeurology (E.T.), Caen University Hospital, University of Caen-Normandie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unite Mixte de Recherche 919, Caen, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7254-2162
M ZuberDepartment of Vascular Neurology (M.Z.), Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph, Université Paris-Descartes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unite Mixte de Recherche S 919, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4049-2746
C ArquizanDepartment of Neurology (C.A.), Montpellier University Hospital, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unite Mixte de Recherche 894, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7347-1039
N DequatreDepartment of Neurology (N.D.), Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2153-1436
O DetanteDepartment of Neurology (O.D.), Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8761-3288
B BienvenuFrom the Departments of Internal Medicine (H.d.B., B.B., A.A.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-4207
A AoubaFrom the Departments of Internal Medicine (H.d.B., B.B., A.A.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1726-3811
L GuillevinDepartment of Internal Medicine (L.G.), Centre Hospitalier Cochin, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6463-2160
C PagnouxVasculitis Clinic (C.P.), Division of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6287-9549
O NaggaraDepartment of Neuroradiology (G.B., O.N.), Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Université Paris-Descartes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unite Mixte de Recherche 894, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9544-379X
Inserm · FRBotswana Geoscience Institute · BWDSM (Netherlands) · NLGroupe Hospitalier Cochin - Port-Royal, Hôtel-Dieu, Broca - La Collégiale · FRMount Sinai Hospital · CAUniversité de Caen Normandie · FRUniversité de Lille · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purpose3D-TOF-MRA and DSA are 2 available tools to demonstrate neurovascular involvement in primary central nervous system vasculitis. We aimed to compare the diagnostic concordance of vessel imaging using 3D-TOF-MRA and DSA in patients with primary central nervous system vasculitis. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively identified all patients included in the French primary central nervous system vasculitis cohort of 85 patients who underwent, at baseline, both intracranial 3D-TOF-MRA and DSA in an interval of no more than 2 weeks and before treatment initiation. Two neuroradiologists independently reviewed all 3D-TOF-MRA and DSA imaging. Brain vasculature was divided into 25 arterial segments. Concordance between 3D-TOF-MRA and DSA for the identification of arterial stenosis was assessed by the Cohen κ Index.

resultsThirty-one patients met the inclusion criteria, including 20 imaged with a 1.5T MR unit and 11 with a 3T MR unit. Among the 25 patients (81%) with abnormal DSA findings, 24 demonstrated abnormal 3D-TOF-MRA findings, whereas all 6 remaining patients with normal DSA findings had normal 3D-TOF-MRA findings. In the per-segment analysis, concordance between 1.5T 3D-TOF-MRA and DSA was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.93), and between 3T 3D-TOF-MRA and DSA, it was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.91).

conclusions3D-TOF-MRA shows a high concordance with DSA in diagnostic performance when analyzing brain vasculature in patients with primary central nervous system vasculitis. In patients with negative 3T 3D-TOF-MRA findings, the added diagnostic value of DSA is limited.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiography, Digital SubtractionCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVasculitis, Central Nervous System

Identifiers

PMID28751515
PMCPMC7963620
OpenAlexW2740873119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.