Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28751481›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Recruitment and retention in a 10-month social network-based intervention promoting diabetes self-management in socioeconomically deprived patients: a qualitative process evaluation.

Charlotte Vissenberg, Vera Nierkens, Paul J M Uitewaal, Barend J C Middelkoop, Karien Stronks

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte VissenbergDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vera NierkensDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul J M UitewaalDepartment of Public Health, The Hague's Public Health, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Barend J C MiddelkoopDepartment of Public Health, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Karien StronksDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSocioeconomically deprived patients with type 2 diabetes often face challenges with self-management, resulting in more diabetes-related complications. However, these groups are often under-represented in self-management interventions. Evidence on effective recruitment and retention strategies is growing, but lacking for intensive self-management interventions. This study aims to explore recruitment, retention and effective intervention strategies in a 10-month group-based intervention among Dutch, Moroccan, Turkish and Surinamese patients from socioeconomically deprived neighbourhoods.

methodsParticipants were recruited through general practitioners (GPs) and participated in a 10-month social network-based intervention (10 groups, n=69):

resultsThe GP's letter and reminder calls, an informational meeting and the intervention's informal nature facilitated recruitment. During the first months, positive group atmosphere, the intervention's perceived usefulness, opportunities to socialise and a reduction in practical barriers facilitated retention. After the first months, conflicting responsibilities and changes in the intervention's nature and planning hindered retention. Calls from group leaders and the prospect of a diploma helped participants overcome these barriers.

conclusionTo promote retention in lengthy self-management interventions, it seems important that patients feel they are going on an outing to a social gathering that is enjoyable, recreational, useful and easy to attend. However, rewards and intensive personal recruitment and retention strategies remained necessary throughout the entire intervention period. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial Register NTR1886; Results.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPatient SelectionSocial SupportAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Evaluation Studies as TopicFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSelf-ManagementSocioeconomic FactorsGlycated Hemoglobinlow socioeconomic groupsrecruitmentretentiontype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28751481
PMCPMC5577887
OpenAlexW2740681850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.