Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28751312›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2017

A Dynamic Hydro-Mechanical and Biochemical Model of Stomatal Conductance for C

Chandra Bellasio, Joe Quirk, Thomas N Buckley, David J Beerling

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Quantifying photosynthetic restrictions.Photosynthesis research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Increased bundle-sheath leakiness of COThe New phytologist · 2022
    Article
  5. Reduction of bundle sheath size boosts cyclic electron flow in CThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A generalised dynamic model of leaf-level CPhotosynthesis research · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Chandra BellasioDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom chandra.bellasio@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3865-7521
Joe QuirkDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-8323
Thomas N BuckleySydney Institute of Agriculture, University of Sydney, Narrabri, New South Wales 2390, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7610-7136
David J BeerlingDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1869-4314
University of Sheffield · GBIstituto per la Valorizzazione del Legno e delle Specie Arboree · ITThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPhotosynthesisCarbon DioxideLightPlant StomataPoaceaeWaterCarbon DioxideWater

Identifiers

PMID28751312
PMCPMC5580762
OpenAlexW2736395311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.