Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28751090›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes2017

The effectiveness of styrene-maleic acid (SMA) copolymers for solubilisation of integral membrane proteins from SMA-accessible and SMA-resistant membranes.

David J K Swainsbury, Stefan Scheidelaar, Nicholas Foster, Rienk van Grondelle, J Antoinette Killian, Michael R Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Amphiphilic Copolymers and Their Role in the Study of Membrane Proteins.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Purification of Potassium Ion Channels Using Styrene-Maleic Acid Copolymers.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Methods for Engineering Binders to Multi-Pass Membrane Proteins.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Sulfonated polystyrenes: pH and MgEuropean polymer journal · 2023
    Article
  13. Cryo-EM structure of the four-subunitProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David J K SwainsburySchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Biomedical Sciences Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom.
Stefan ScheidelaarMembrane Biochemistry & Biophysics, Utrecht University, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nicholas FosterSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Biomedical Sciences Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom.
Rienk van GrondelleDivision of Physics and Astronomy, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
J Antoinette KillianMembrane Biochemistry & Biophysics, Utrecht University, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michael R JonesSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Biomedical Sciences Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: m.r.jones@bristol.ac.ukc.
University of Bristol · GBUtrecht University · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I022570/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L01386X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solubilisation of biological lipid bilayer membranes for analysis of their protein complement has traditionally been carried out using detergents, but there is increasing interest in the use of amphiphilic copolymers such as styrene maleic acid (SMA) for the solubilisation, purification and characterisation of integral membrane proteins in the form of protein/lipid nanodiscs. Here we survey the effectiveness of various commercially-available formulations of the SMA copolymer in solubilising Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centres (RCs) from photosynthetic membranes. We find that formulations of SMA with a 2:1 or 3:1 ratio of styrene to maleic acid are almost as effective as detergent in solubilising RCs, with the best solubilisation by short chain variants (<30kDa weight average molecular weight). The effectiveness of 10kDa 2:1 and 3:1 formulations of SMA to solubilise RCs gradually declined when genetically-encoded coiled-coil bundles were used to artificially tether normally monomeric RCs into dimeric, trimeric and tetrameric multimers. The ability of SMA to solubilise reaction centre-light harvesting 1 (RC-LH1) complexes from densely packed and highly ordered photosynthetic membranes was uniformly low, but could be increased through a variety of treatments to increase the lipid:protein ratio. However, proteins isolated from such membranes comprised clusters of complexes in small membrane patches rather than individual proteins. We conclude that short-chain 2:1 and 3:1 formulations of SMA are the most effective in solubilising integral membrane proteins, but that solubilisation efficiencies are strongly influenced by the size of the target protein and the density of packing of proteins in the membrane.

Indexed as

DetergentsLight-Harvesting Protein ComplexesLipid BilayersLipidsMaleatesMembrane ProteinsMembranesPolymersRhodobacter sphaeroidesStyreneDetergentsLight-Harvesting Protein ComplexesLipid BilayersLipidsMaleatesmaleic acidMembrane ProteinsPolymersStyreneDetergentLight harvestingMembrane proteinNanodiscReaction centreStyrene—maleic acid

Identifiers

PMID28751090
PMCPMC5593810
OpenAlexW2737300807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.