Trial reportVaccine2017
Tularemia vaccine: Safety, reactogenicity, "Take" skin reactions, and antibody responses following vaccination with a new lot of the Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain - A phase 2 randomized clinical Trial.
Trial report in Vaccine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01150695 (A Phase II, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial Comparing the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Francisella Tularensis Live Vaccine Strain), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial Comparing the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Francisella Tularensis Live Vaccine Strain (LVS) Vaccine Produced by DynPort Vaccine Company (DVC-LVS) to a LVS Vaccine in Use by the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID-LVS)
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Vacc-SeqQC project: Benchmarking RNA-Seq for clinical vaccine studies.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Trial
- Tularemia: Historical Perspectives and Current Challenges of a Re-Emerging Zoonosis.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Infectious bacteria as biological warfare agents: mechanisms, epidemiological threats, and defense strategies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Historical Advances in Clinical Trial Design and Expanding Representation as the New Frontier for Innovation.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Article
- Emerging and Pandemic Pathogens: Lessons Learned From a Clinical Research Network.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Review
- From Yesterday to Tomorrow: How Vaccine Platforms Have Shaped the Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Article
- Development of a multi-epitope vaccine from outer membrane proteins and identification of novel drug targets againstFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Development of Effective Medical Countermeasures Against the Main Biowarfare Agents: The Importance of Antibodies.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Review
- IL-12p40 is essential but not sufficient for Francisella tularensis LVS clearance in chronically infected mice.PloS one · 2023Article
- Deletion Mutants ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Modern Development and Production of a New Live Attenuated Bacterial Vaccine, SCHU S4Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Replicating bacterium-vectored vaccine expressing SARS-CoV-2 Membrane and Nucleocapsid proteins protects against severe COVID-19-like disease in hamsters.NPJ vaccines · 2021Article
- Vaccine-related major cutaneous reaction size correlates with cellular-mediated immune responses after tularaemia immunisation.Clinical & translational immunology · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Transcriptomic and Metabolic Responses to a Live-AttenuatedVaccines · 2020Article
- Article
- Live Vaccination Generates Both Disease Tolerance and Host Resistance During Chronic Pulmonary Infection With Highly Virulent Francisella tularensis SchuS4.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Live Attenuated Tularemia Vaccines for Protection Against Respiratory Challenge With VirulentFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTularemia is caused by Francisella tularensis, a gram-negative bacterium that has been weaponized as an aerosol. For protection of personnel conducting biodefense research, the United States Army required clinical evaluation of a new lot of tularemia live vaccine strain manufactured in accordance with Current Good Manufacturing Practices.
methodsA phase 2 randomized clinical trial compared the new lot (DVC-LVS) to the existing vaccine that has been in use for decades (USAMRIID-LVS). The vaccines were delivered by scarification to 228 participants. Safety, reactogenicity, take and/or antibody levels were assessed on days 0, 1, 2, 8, 14, 28, 56, and 180. PRINCIPAL
resultsBoth vaccines were safe and had acceptable reactogenicity profiles during six months of follow-up. There were no serious or grade 3 and 4 laboratory adverse events. Moderate systemic reactogenicity (mostly headache or feeling tired) was reported by ∼23% of participants receiving either vaccine. Injection site reactogenicity was mostly mild itchiness and pain. The frequencies of vaccine take skin reactions were 73% (95% CI, 64, 81) for DVC-LVS and 80% (95% CI, 71, 87) for USAMRIID-LVS. The 90% CI for the difference in proportions was -6.9% (-16.4, 2.6). The rates of seroconversion measured by microagglutination assay on days 28 or 56 were 94% (95% CI, 88, 98; n=98/104) for DVC-LVS and 94% (95% CI, 87, 97; n=103/110) for USAMRIID-LVS (p=1.00). Day 14 sera revealed more rapid seroconversion for DVC-LVS relative to USAMRIID-LVS: 82% (95% CI, 73, 89) versus 55% (95% CI, 45, 65), respectively (p<0.0001). MAJOR
conclusionsThe DVC-LVS vaccine had similar safety, reactogenicity, take and antibody responses compared to the older USAMRIID vaccine, and was superior for early (day 14) antibody production. Vaccination take was not a sensitive surrogate for seroconversion in a multi-center study where personnel at five research clinics performed assessments. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01150695.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.