Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28750680›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2017

Primary tumor location as a predictor of the benefit of palliative resection for colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis.

Rong-Xin Zhang, Wen-Juan Ma, Yu-Ting Gu, Tian-Qi Zhang, Zhi-Mei Huang, Zhen-Hai Lu, Yang-Kui Gu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recent advances in treatment for colorectal liver metastasis.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rong-Xin ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wen-Juan MaState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yu-Ting GuMedical Record Department of The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Tian-Qi ZhangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhi-Mei HuangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhen-Hai LuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. luzhh@sysucc.org.cn.
Yang-Kui GuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. guyk@sysucc.org.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is still under debate that whether stage IV colorectal cancer patients with unresectable metastasis can benefit from primary tumor resection, especially for asymptomatic colorectal cancer patients. Retrospective studies have shown controversial results concerning the benefit from surgery. This retrospective study aims to evaluate whether the site of primary tumor is a predictor of palliative resection in asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer patients.

methodsOne hundred ninety-four patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer were selected from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Database in the period between January 2007 and December 2013. All information was carefully reviewed and collected, including the treatment, age, sex, carcinoembryonic antigen, site of tumor, histology, cancer antigen 199, number of liver metastases, and largest diameter of liver metastasis. The univariate and multivariate analyses were used to detect the relationship between primary tumor resection and overall survival of unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer patients.

resultsOne hundred twenty-five received palliative resection, and 69 received only chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis indicated that primary tumor site was one of the independent factors (RR 0.569, P = 0.007) that influenced overall survival. For left-side colon cancer patients, primary tumor resection prolonged the median overall survival time for 8 months (palliative resection vs. no palliative resection: 22 vs. 14 months, P = 0.009); however, for right-side colon cancer patients, palliative resection showed no benefit (12 vs. 10 months, P = 0.910).

conclusionsThis study showed that left-side colon cancer patients might benefit from the primary tumor resection in terms of overall survival. This result should be further explored in a prospective study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateAsymptomatic DiseasesCarcinoembryonic AntigenChinaColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm StagingPalliative CareAntigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydratecarbohydrate antigen 199, humanCarcinoembryonic AntigenColorectal cancerPrimary tumor siteUnresectable liver metastases

Identifiers

PMID28750680
PMCPMC5530936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.