Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28750673›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

The intervention process in the European Fans in Training (EuroFIT) trial: a mixed method protocol for evaluation.

I van de Glind, C Bunn, C M Gray, K Hunt, E Andersen, J Jelsma, H Morgan, H Pereira, G Roberts, J Rooksby and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

I van de GlindRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
C BunnInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, 27 Bute Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK. christopher.bunn@glasgow.ac.uk.
C M GrayInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, 27 Bute Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK.
K HuntMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, 200 Renfield St, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G2 3QB, UK.
E AndersenDepartment of Coaching and Psychology, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
J JelsmaDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, The Netherlands.
H MorganHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
H PereiraInterdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, Estrada da Costa, 1495-688, Cruz Quebrada, Portugal.
G RobertsDepartment of Coaching and Psychology, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
J RooksbySchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.
Ø RøynesdalDepartment of Coaching and Psychology, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
M SilvaInterdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, Estrada da Costa, 1495-688, Cruz Quebrada, Portugal.
M SorensenDepartment of Coaching and Psychology, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
S TreweekHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
T van AchterbergKU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Leuven, Belgium.
H van der PloegDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, The Netherlands.
F van NassauDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, The Netherlands.
M Nijhuis-van der SandenRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
S WykeInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, 27 Bute Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEuroFIT is a gender-sensitised, health and lifestyle program targeting physical activity, sedentary time and dietary behaviours in men. The delivery of the program in football clubs, led by the clubs' community coaches, is designed to both attract and engage men in lifestyle change through an interest in football or loyalty to the club they support. The EuroFIT program will be evaluated in a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT), for which ~1000 overweight men, aged 30-65 years, will be recruited in 15 top professional football clubs in the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and the UK. The process evaluation is designed to investigate how implementation within the RCT is achieved in the various football clubs and countries and the processes through which EuroFIT affects outcomes.

methodsThis mixed methods evaluation is guided by the Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance for conducting process evaluations of complex interventions. Data will be collected in the intervention arm of the EuroFIT trial through: participant questionnaires (n = 500); attendance sheets and coach logs (n = 360); observations of sessions (n = 30); coach questionnaires (n = 30); usage logs from a novel device for self-monitoring physical activity and non-sedentary behaviour (SitFIT); an app-based game to promote social support for physical activity outside program sessions (MatchFIT); interviews with coaches (n = 15); football club representatives (n = 15); and focus groups with participants (n = 30). Written standard operating procedures are used to ensure quality and consistency in data collection and analysis across the participating countries. Data will be analysed thematically within datasets and overall synthesis of findings will address the processes through which the program is implemented in various countries and clubs and through which it affects outcomes, with careful attention to the context of the football club. DISCUSSION: The process evaluation will provide a comprehensive account of what was necessary to implement the EuroFIT program in professional football clubs within a trial setting and how outcomes were affected by the program. This will allow us to re-appraise the program's conceptual base, optimise the program for post-trial implementation and roll out, and offer suggestions for the development and implementation of future initiatives to promote health and wellbeing through professional sports clubs.

trial registrationISRCTN81935608 . Registered on 16 June 2015.

Indexed as

Healthy LifestyleSelf CareSoccerAdultAgedDiet, HealthyEuropeExerciseFocus GroupsHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsOverweightBehaviour changeComplex interventionDietFootballHealth promotionMasculinityMen’s healthPhysical activityProcess evaluationPublic healthSedentary lifestyleSports stadia

Identifiers

PMID28750673
PMCPMC5531072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.