ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
Assessing the model transferability for prediction of transcription factor binding sites based on chromatin accessibility.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling strategies forBioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Identification of potential biomarkers for Lyme disease using bioinformatics and machine learning.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- When Dad's Stress Gets under Kid's Skin-Impacts of Stress on Germline Cargo and Embryonic Development.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Prediction of mammalian tissue-specific CLOCK-BMAL1 binding to E-box DNA motifs.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- An Evidence Theory and Fuzzy Logic Combined Approach for the Prediction of Potential ARF-Regulated Genes in Quinoa.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- From reads to insight: a hitchhiker's guide to ATAC-seq data analysis.Genome biology · 2020Review
- A comprehensive review of computational prediction of genome-wide features.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Accurate prediction of cell type-specific transcription factor binding.Genome biology · 2019Article
- Epigenomic profiling of retinal progenitors reveals LHX2 is required for developmental regulation of open chromatin.Communications biology · 2019Article
- Predicting transcription factor binding using ensemble random forest models.F1000Research · 2018Article
- TFBSFootprinter: a multiomics tool for prediction of transcription factor binding sites in vertebrate species.TranscriptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComputational prediction of transcription factor (TF) binding sites in different cell types is challenging. Recent technology development allows us to determine the genome-wide chromatin accessibility in various cellular and developmental contexts. The chromatin accessibility profiles provide useful information in prediction of TF binding events in various physiological conditions. Furthermore, ChIP-Seq analysis was used to determine genome-wide binding sites for a range of different TFs in multiple cell types. Integration of these two types of genomic information can improve the prediction of TF binding events.
resultsWe assessed to what extent a model built upon on other TFs and/or other cell types could be used to predict the binding sites of TFs of interest. A random forest model was built using a set of cell type-independent features such as specific sequences recognized by the TFs and evolutionary conservation, as well as cell type-specific features derived from chromatin accessibility data. Our analysis suggested that the models learned from other TFs and/or cell lines performed almost as well as the model learned from the target TF in the cell type of interest. Interestingly, models based on multiple TFs performed better than single-TF models. Finally, we proposed a universal model, BPAC, which was generated using ChIP-Seq data from multiple TFs in various cell types.
conclusionIntegrating chromatin accessibility information with sequence information improves prediction of TF binding.The prediction of TF binding is transferable across TFs and/or cell lines suggesting there are a set of universal "rules". A computational tool was developed to predict TF binding sites based on the universal "rules".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.