Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28750548›Full record

ArticleClinical rehabilitation2018

A feasibility study of a novel, task-specific movement training intervention for women with patellofemoral pain.

Gretchen B Salsich, Barbara Yemm, Karen Steger-May, Catherine E Lang, Linda R Van Dillen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect of movement-evoked and tonic experimental pain on muscle force production.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gait Retraining as an Intervention for Patellofemoral Pain.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gretchen B Salsich1 Program in Physical Therapy, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Barbara Yemm1 Program in Physical Therapy, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Karen Steger-May2 Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Catherine E Lang3 Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Linda R Van Dillen3 Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether a novel, task-specific training intervention that focused on correcting pain-producing movement patterns was feasible and whether it would improve hip and knee kinematics, pain, and function in women with patellofemoral pain.

designProspective, non-randomized, within-group, double baseline, feasibility intervention study. SUBJECTS: A total of 25 women with patellofemoral pain were enrolled.

interventionThe intervention, delivered 2×/week for six weeks, consisted of supervised, high-repetition practice of daily weight-bearing and recreational activities. Activities were selected and progressed based on participants' interest and ability to maintain optimal alignment without increasing pain. MAIN MEASURES: Primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment, retention, adherence, and treatment credibility (Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire). Secondary outcomes assessing intervention effects were hip and knee kinematics, pain (visual analog scale: current, average in past week, maximum in past week), and function (Patient-Specific Functional Scale).

resultsA total of 25 participants were recruited and 23 were retained (92% retention). Self-reported average daily adherence was 79% and participants were able to perform their prescribed home program correctly (reduced hip and knee frontal plane angles) by the second intervention visit. On average, treatment credibility was rated 25 (out of 27) and expectancy was rated 22 (out of 27). Hip and knee kinematics, pain, and function improved following the intervention when compared to the control phase.

conclusionBased on the feasibility outcomes and preliminary intervention effects, this task-specific training intervention warrants further investigation and should be evaluated in a larger, randomized clinical trial.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMotion Therapy, Continuous PassivePain MeasurementPatellofemoral Pain SyndromePatient ComplianceProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnterior knee paingait retrainingkinematicsphysical therapy

Identifiers

PMID28750548
PMCPMC5748381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.