Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28750478›Full record

ArticleHuman psychopharmacology2017

Multiple DSM-5 substance use disorders: A national study of US adults.

Sean Esteban McCabe, Brady T West, Emily M Jutkiewicz, Carol J Boyd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Latent transition analysis of time-varying cannabis use motives to inform adaptive interventions.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Generalized genetic liability to substance use disorders.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sean Esteban McCabeInstitute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9622-4652
Brady T WestSurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Emily M JutkiewiczDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Carol J BoydInstitute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Trajectories of Prescription Nonmedical Drug MisuseR01DA031160 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SEAN ESTEBAN MCCABE · 2011 to 2026
$3.7M
Longitudinal Changes in Recovery from Drug Use Disorders: A National StudyR01DA036541 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MCCABE, SEAN ESTEBAN · 2015 to 2017
$647k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031160NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur aim is to determine the lifetime and past-year prevalence estimates of multiple Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fifth edition (DSM-5) substance use disorders (SUDs) among U.S. adults.

methodsThe 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions featured in-person interviews with a nationally representative sample of adults aged 18 and older.

resultsThe majority of past-year nonalcohol DSM-5 SUDs had at least 1 other co-occurring past-year SUD, ranging from 56.8% (SE = 3.4) for past-year prescription opioid use disorder to 97.5% (SE = 2.7) for past-year hallucinogen use disorder. In contrast, only 15.0% (SE = 0.6) of past-year alcohol use disorders had a co-occurring past-year SUD. The odds of past-year multiple SUDs were greater among males, younger adults, African-Americans, and those with mood, personality, posttraumatic stress, or multiple psychiatric disorders.

conclusionsAssessment, diagnosis, and treatment often focus on individual substance-specific SUDs rather than multiple SUDs, despite evidence for substantial rates of polysubstance use in clinical and epidemiological studies. There are notable differences in the prevalence of multiple SUDs between alcohol use disorders and other nonalcohol SUDs that have important clinical implications; for example, multiple SUDs are more persistent than individual SUDs. These findings suggest that clinical assessment and diagnosis should screen for multiple SUDs, especially among adults with nonalcohol DSM-5 SUDs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedComorbidityDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPrevalenceSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesYoung AdultDSM-5epidemiologypolysubstancesubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID28750478
PMCPMC5898189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.