Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28750247›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2017

Macaque monkeys in Zika virus research: 1947-present.

Christina Newman, Thomas C Friedrich, David H O'Connor

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Virus as Teratogenic Agents.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Translational Utility of the Nonhuman Primate Model.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2022
    Review
  9. Anti-viral triterpenes: a review.Phytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Zika virus infection and implications for kidney disease.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Species-specific disruption of STING-dependent antiviral cellular defenses by the Zika virus NS2B3 protease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christina NewmanUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 3170 Medical Foundation Centennial Building (MFCB), 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, United States.
Thomas C FriedrichUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, 2015 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, United States; Wisconsin National Primate Research Center (WNPRC), 1220 Capitol Court, Madison, WI 53715, United States.
David H O'ConnorUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 3170 Medical Foundation Centennial Building (MFCB), 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, United States; Wisconsin National Primate Research Center (WNPRC), 1220 Capitol Court, Madison, WI 53715, United States. Electronic address: dhoconno@wisc.edu.

Funding

WNPRC Supplemental Request for Nonhuman Primate Enclosures to Equip HIV/AIDS-Related Research FacilitiesP51OD011106 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska · 2012 to 2026
$150.7M
GBV-C-mediated protection from AIDS in humans and GBV-C/SIV co-infected macaquesR01AI116382 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI O'CONNOR, DAVID H. · 2015 to 2018
$6.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116382NIH HHS P51 OD011106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zika virus was first isolated in 1947 from an exotic rhesus macaque. Nearly 70 years later, the emergence of Zika virus in the Americas and its newly described association with birth defects has motivated the development of captive macaque monkey models of human Zika virus infection. This review describes similarities between macaque and human Zika virus pathogenesis and discusses specific advantages and disadvantages of using macaques instead of other laboratory animal models. In particular, macaques provide an outstanding model for understanding in utero Zika virus infections that are essential for evaluating preclinical interventions for use in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalZika Virus InfectionAnimalsBiomedical ResearchFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHumansMacaca mulattaPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousZika Virus

Identifiers

PMID28750247
PMCPMC5610623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.