Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28750102›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Stability of bacteriophages in burn wound care products.

Maia Merabishvili, Riet Monserez, Jonas van Belleghem, Thomas Rose, Serge Jennes, Daniel De Vos, Gilbert Verbeken, Mario Vaneechoutte, Jean-Paul Pirnay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Phage Therapy forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maia MerabishviliLaboratory for Molecular and Cellular Technology, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2566-0772
Riet MonserezHospital Pharmacy, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Jonas van BelleghemLaboratory for Bacteriology Research, Faculty Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Thomas RoseBurn Wound Center, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Serge JennesBurn Wound Center, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Daniel De VosLaboratory for Molecular and Cellular Technology, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Gilbert VerbekenLaboratory for Molecular and Cellular Technology, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Mario VaneechoutteLaboratory for Bacteriology Research, Faculty Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jean-Paul PirnayLaboratory for Molecular and Cellular Technology, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Queen Astrid Military Hospital · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages could be used along with burn wound care products to enhance antimicrobial pressure during treatment. However, some of the components of the topical antimicrobials that are traditionally used for the prevention and treatment of burn wound infection might affect the activity of phages. Therefore, it is imperative to determine the counteraction of therapeutic phage preparations by burn wound care products before application in patients. Five phages, representatives of two morphological families (Myoviridae and Podoviridae) and active against 3 common bacterial burn wound pathogens (Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus) were tested against 13 different products commonly used in the treatment of burn wounds. The inactivation of the phages was quite variable for different phages and different products. Majority of the anti-infective products affected phage activity negatively either immediately or in the course of time, although impact was not always significant. Products with high acidity had the most adverse effect on phages. Our findings demonstrate that during combined treatment the choice of phages and wound care products must be carefully defined in advance.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacteriophagesBurnsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationWound InfectionAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID28750102
PMCPMC5531522
OpenAlexW2739514884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.