Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28750001›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2017

Classical conditioning without verbal suggestions elicits placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia.

Przemysław Bąbel, Elżbieta A Bajcar, Wacław Adamczyk, Paweł Kicman, Natalia Lisińska, Karolina Świder, Luana Colloca

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Nocebo Effect.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Przemysław BąbelPain Research Group, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0578-1013
Elżbieta A BajcarPain Research Group, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Wacław AdamczykPain Research Group, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Paweł KicmanPain Research Group, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Natalia LisińskaPain Research Group, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Karolina ŚwiderPain Research Group, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Luana CollocaDepartment of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Jagiellonian University · PLUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the relationships among classical conditioning, expectancy, and fear in placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia. A total of 42 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to three groups: placebo, nocebo, and control. They received 96 electrical stimuli, preceded by either orange or blue lights. A hidden conditioning procedure, in which participants were not informed about the meaning of coloured lights, was performed in the placebo and nocebo groups. Light of one colour was paired with pain stimuli of moderate intensity (control stimuli), and light of the other colour was paired with either nonpainful stimuli (in the placebo group) or painful stimuli of high intensity (in the nocebo group). In the control group, both colour lights were followed by control stimuli of moderate intensity without any conditioning procedure. Participants rated pain intensity, expectancy of pain intensity, and fear. In the testing phase, when both of the coloured lights were followed by identical moderate pain stimuli, we found a significant analgesic effect in the placebo group, and a significant hyperalgesic effect in the nocebo group. Neither expectancy nor fear ratings predicted placebo analgesia or nocebo hyperalgesia. It appears that a hidden conditioning procedure, without any explicit verbal suggestions, elicits placebo and nocebo effects, however we found no evidence that these effects are predicted by either expectancy or fear. These results suggest that classical conditioning may be a distinct mechanism for placebo and nocebo effects.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaConditioning, ClassicalAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceFearFemaleHumansHyperalgesiaNocebo EffectPlacebo EffectRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28750001
PMCPMC5531508
OpenAlexW2740307641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.