Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28749979›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Attitudes and decision-making about early-infant versus early-adolescent male circumcision: Demand-side insights for sustainable HIV prevention strategies in Zambia and Zimbabwe.

Sema K Sgaier, Sunny Sharma, Maria Eletskaya, Ram Prasad, Owen Mugurungi, Bushimbwa Tambatamba, Getrude Ncube, Sinokuthemba Xaba, Alice Nanga, Sehlulekile Gumede-Moyo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Sema K SgaierSurgo Foundation, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Sunny SharmaIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Maria EletskayaIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Ram PrasadFinal Mile Consulting, Mumbai, India.
Owen MugurungiMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Bushimbwa TambatambaMinistry of Community Development, Mother and Child Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Getrude NcubeMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Sinokuthemba XabaMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Alice NangaIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Sehlulekile Gumede-MoyoIpsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Steve KretschmerSurgo Foundation, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Ipsos (United Kingdom) · GBMinistry of Health and Child Welfare · ZWHarvard Global Health Institute · USMinistry of Community Development, Mother and Child Health · ZM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As countries approach their scale-up targets for the voluntary medical male circumcision program for HIV prevention, they are strategizing and planning for the sustainability phase to follow. Global guidance recommends circumcising adolescent (below 14 years) and/or early infant boys (aged 0-60 days), and countries need to consider several factors before prioritizing a cohort for their sustainability phase. We provide community and healthcare provider-side insights on attitudes and decision-making process as a key input for this strategic decision in Zambia and Zimbabwe. We studied expectant parents, parents of infant boys (aged 0-60 days), family members and neo-natal and ante-natal healthcare providers in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Our integrated methodology consisted of in-depth qualitative and quantitative one-on-one interviews, and a simulated-decision-making game, to uncover attitudes towards, and the decision-making process for, early adolescent or early infant medical circumcision (EAMC or EIMC). In both countries, parents viewed early infancy and early adolescence as equally ideal ages for circumcision (38% EIMC vs. 37% EAMC in Zambia; 24% vs. 27% in Zimbabwe). If offered for free, about half of Zambian parents and almost 2 in 5 Zimbabwean parents indicated they would likely circumcise their infant boy; however, half of parents in each country perceived that the community would not accept EIMC. Nurses believed their facilities currently could not absorb EIMC services and that they would have limited ability to influence fathers, who were seen as having the primary decision-making authority. Our analysis suggests that EAMC is more accepted by the community than EIMC and is the path of least resistance for the sustainability phase of VMMC. However, parents or community members do not reject EIMC. Should countries choose to prioritize this cohort for their sustainability phase, a number of barriers around information, decision-making by parents, and supply side will need to be addressed.

Indexed as

Circumcision, MaleClinical Decision-MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsHumansInfantMaleParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareZambiaZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID28749979
PMCPMC5531536
OpenAlexW2741356311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.