Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28749972›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Investigating asymmetric salt profiles for nanopore DNA sequencing with biological porin MspA.

Ian C Nova, Ian M Derrington, Jonathan M Craig, Matthew T Noakes, Benjamin I Tickman, Kenji Doering, Hugh Higinbotham, Andrew H Laszlo, Jens H Gundlach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Biological Nanopores: Engineering on Demand.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fabrication and Applications of Solid-State Nanopores.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian C NovaDepartment of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1070-942X
Ian M DerringtonDepartment of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Jonathan M CraigDepartment of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Matthew T NoakesDepartment of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Benjamin I TickmanDepartment of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Kenji DoeringDepartment of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Hugh HiginbothamDepartment of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Andrew H LaszloDepartment of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Jens H GundlachDepartment of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0773-8038
University of Washington · US

Funding

Nanopore sequencing of DNA with MspAR01HG005115 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GUNDLACH, JENS, LASZLO, ANDREW · 2009 to 2024
$14.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanopore DNA sequencing is a promising single-molecule analysis technology. This technique relies on a DNA motor enzyme to control movement of DNA precisely through a nanopore. Specific experimental buffer conditions are required based on the preferred operating conditions of the DNA motor enzyme. While many DNA motor enzymes typically operate in salt concentrations under 100 mM, salt concentration simultaneously affects signal and noise magnitude as well as DNA capture rate in nanopore sequencing, limiting standard experimental conditions to salt concentrations greater than ~100 mM in order to maintain adequate resolution and experimental throughput. We evaluated the signal contribution from ions on both sides of the membrane (cis and trans) by varying cis and trans [KCl] independently during phi29 DNA Polymerase-controlled translocation of DNA through the biological porin MspA. Our studies reveal that during DNA translocation, the negatively charged DNA increases cation selectivity through MspA with the majority of current produced by the flow of K+ ions from trans to cis. Varying trans [K+] has dramatic effects on the signal magnitude, whereas changing cis [Cl-] produces only small effects. Good signal-to-noise can be maintained with cis [Cl-] as small as 20 mM, if the concentration of KCl on the trans side is kept high. These results demonstrate the potential of using salt-sensitive motor enzymes (helicases, polymerases, recombinases) in nanopore systems and offer a guide for selecting buffer conditions in future experiments to simultaneously optimize signal, throughput, and enzyme activity.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsChloridesDNA, Single-StrandedKineticsNanotechnologyPorinsPotassiumSequence Analysis, DNABacterial ProteinsChloridesDNA, Single-StrandedPorinsPotassium

Identifiers

PMID28749972
PMCPMC5531483
OpenAlexW2739963593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.