ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2017
Comparative study of clinical features of patients with celiac disease & those with concurrent celiac disease & type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiomyopathy in Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Anemia in Celiac Disease: Prevalence, Associated Clinical and Laboratory Features, and Persistence after Gluten-Free Diet.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Dilated cardiomyopathy associated with celiac disease: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2021Article
- New Evidence in the Pathogenesis of Celiac Disease and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2021Review
- Persistent Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients with Celiac Disease Despite a Gluten-Free Diet.Nutrients · 2020Review
- Beneficial effects of gluten free diet on IgA tissue transglutaminase levels and various growth parameters in celiac disease patients.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2019Article
- Anemia in celiac disease is multifactorial in etiology: A prospective study from India.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018Article
- Celiac disease in type 1 diabetes mellitus: What are the implications of early diagnosis?The Indian journal of medical research · 2018Article
- Neuroprotective Effects of Amylin Analogues on Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis and Cognition.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2018Review
- Genome sequence and comparative genomic analysis of a clinically important strain CD11-4 ofGut pathogens · 2018Article
- Medical Nutrition Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
objectivesCeliac disease (CD) and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) share a common genetic locus and clinical manifestations. The present study was planned to compare clinical, biochemical and hormonal profiles of patients with CD and CD with T1DM.
methodsRecords of CD patients with age ≤20 yr, available anthropometric measurements, haematological, biochemical and hormonal workup with tissue transglutaminase IgA antibody and duodenal biopsy (Marsh grade) were screened. The patients were divided into two groups i.e., CD alone (Group A) and concurrent CD with T1DM (Group B).
resultsOne hundred and nine patients of CD (57 male) with a mean age of 14.9±2.9 yr were evaluated. Of these, 86 (78.9%) patients had CD alone and 23 (13 females) (21.1%) patients had CD with T1DM. The age at diagnosis and the lag duration for the diagnosis of CD were 11.5±4.6 versus 13.8±3.4 yr (P<0.05) and 48.8 ±43.3 versus 20.2±31.8 months (P<0.05) in groups A and B, respectively. The most common histopathological grade was type 3b (59.2%) in group A and type 2 (42.1%) in group B. Short stature (87% vs. 40.9%; P<0.01), anaemia (80.9% vs. 45%, P<0.01) and delayed puberty (61.9% vs. 29.4%; P<0.01) were more common in group A. INTERPRETATION &
conclusionsPatients with CD alone have a longer lag time to diagnosis and consequent sequel in the form of anaemia, short stature and delayed puberty, as compared to patients with concurrent CD and T1DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.