Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28749165›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2017

Impact of robotic ultrasound image guidance on plan quality in SBRT of the prostate.

Stefan Gerlach, Ivo Kuhlemann, Floris Ernst, Christoph Fürweger, Alexander Schlaefer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AI-based optimization for US-guided radiation therapy of the prostate.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
  2. Systematic analysis of volumetric ultrasound parameters for markerless 4D motion tracking.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Analysis and optimization of the robot setup for robotic-ultrasound-guided radiation therapy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan Gerlach1 Institute of Medical Technology, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Ivo Kuhlemann2 Institute for Robotics and Cognitive Systems, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Floris Ernst2 Institute for Robotics and Cognitive Systems, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Christoph Fürweger3 Europäisches Cyberknife Zentrum München-Großhadern, Munich, Germany.
Alexander Schlaefer1 Institute of Medical Technology, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
University of Lübeck · DEHamburg University of Technology · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUltrasound provides good image quality, fast volumetric imaging and is established for abdominal image guidance. Robotic transducer placement may facilitate intrafractional motion compensation in radiation therapy. We consider integration with the CyberKnife and study whether the kinematic redundancy of a seven-degrees-of-freedom robot allows for acceptable plan quality for prostate treatments.

methodsReference treatment plans were generated for 10 prostate cancer cases previously treated with the CyberKnife. Considering transducer and prostate motion by different safety margins, 10 different robot poses, and 3 different elbow configurations, we removed all beams colliding with robot or transducer. For each combination, plans were generated using the same strict dose constraints and the objective to maximize the target coverage. Additionally, plans for the union of all unblocked beams were generated.

resultsIn 9 cases the planning target coverage with the ultrasound robot was within 1.1 percentage points of the reference coverage. It was 1.7 percentage points for one large prostate. For one preferable robot position, kinematic redundancy decreased the average number of blocked beam directions from 23.1 to 14.5.

conclusionThe impact of beam blocking can largely be offset by treatment planning and using a kinematically redundant robot. Plan quality can be maintained by carefully choosing the ultrasound robot position and pose. For smaller planning target volumes the difference in coverage is negligible for safety margins of up to 35 mm. Advances in knowledge: Integrating a robot for online intrafractional image guidance based on ultrasound can be realized while maintaining acceptable plan quality for prostate cancer treatments with the CyberKnife.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Image-GuidedRobotic Surgical ProceduresUltrasonography, InterventionalHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalProstatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID28749165
PMCPMC5853352
OpenAlexW2740790076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.