Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28749164›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2017

Distribution and chemical forms of gadolinium in the brain: a review.

Tomonori Kanda, Yudai Nakai, Akifumi Hagiwara, Hiroshi Oba, Keiko Toyoda, Shigeru Furui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Whole-body MRI: a powerful alternative to bone scan for bone marrow staging without radiation and gadolinium enhancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Manganese Uptake and Accumulation in the Human Brain.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tomonori Kanda1 Department of Radiology, Kobe University School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2719-8283
Yudai Nakai1 Department of Radiology, Kobe University School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Akifumi Hagiwara1 Department of Radiology, Kobe University School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Hiroshi Oba2 Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiko Toyoda2 Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeru Furui3 Department of Radiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 3 years since residual gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) in the brain was first reported, much has been learned about its accumulation, including the pathway of GBCA entry into the brain, the brain distribution of GBCA and its excretion. Here we review recent progress in understanding the routes of gadolinium deposition in brain structures.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCerebellar NucleiContrast MediaEnvironmental PollutantsGadoliniumGadolinium DTPAGlobus PallidusHeterocyclic CompoundsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMeglumineOrganometallic CompoundsRatsContrast MediaEnvironmental PollutantsgadobutrolGadoliniumGadolinium DTPAgadoterate megluminegadoteridolHeterocyclic CompoundsMeglumineOrganometallic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID28749164
PMCPMC5963376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.