ArticleThe Hastings Center report2017
The Precision Medicine Nation.
Article in The Hastings Center report, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- "I make my own decisions": Views on precision medicine research participation decisions from adults with intellectual disability.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Adults with Intellectual Disability and Consent to Precision Medicine Research: Using Supported Decision-Making to Facilitate First-Person Consent.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2026Article
- Consideration and Disclosure of Group Risks in Genomics and Other Data-Centric Research: Does the Common Rule Need Revision?The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2025Article
- 'Being disabled' as an exclusion criterion for clinical trials: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Community Engagement in Precision Medicine Research: Organizational Practices and Their Impacts for Equity.AJOB empirical bioethics · 2023Article
- Scientists' Views on Scientific Self-Governance for Human Genome Editing Research.Human gene therapy · 2022Article
- Perceptions of 'Precision' and 'Personalised' Medicine in Singapore and Associated Ethical Issues.Asian bioethics review · 2021Article
- Governing Personalized Health: A Scoping Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Precision Health: The Role of the Social and Behavioral Sciences in Advancing the Vision.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2020Article
- A roadmap for precision medicine research recruitment: empirical assessment of the public's willingness to participate.Personalized medicine · 2020Article
- Predictably unequal: understanding and addressing concerns that algorithmic clinical prediction may increase health disparities.NPJ digital medicine · 2020Review
- Including the blind community in precision medicine research: findings from a national survey and recommendations.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Article
- Should UK primary care be an early adopter of genomic medicine?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Article
- Cultivating inclusivity in precision medicine research: disability, diversity, and cultural competence.Journal of community genetics · 2019Article
- The physician-patient relationship in the age of precision medicine.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Article
- Contested futures: envisioning "Personalized," "Stratified," and "Precision" medicine.New genetics and society · 2019Article
- What's in a Name? The Politics of 'Precision Medicine'.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2018Article
- Return of Value in the New Era of Biomedical Research-One Size Will Not Fit All.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The United States' ambitious Precision Medicine Initiative proposes to accelerate exponentially the adoption of precision medicine, an approach to health care that tailors disease diagnosis, treatment, and prevention to individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle. It aims to achieve this by creating a cohort of volunteers for precision medicine research, accelerating biomedical research innovation, and adopting policies geared toward patients' empowerment. As strategies to implement the PMI are formulated, critical consideration of the initiative's ethical and sociopolitical dimensions is needed. Drawing on scholarship of nationalism and democracy, we discuss the PMI's construction of what we term "genomic citizenship"; the possible normative obligations arising therefrom; and the ethical, legal, and social challenges that will ensue. Although the PMI is a work in progress, discussion of the existing and emerging issues can facilitate the development of policies, structures, and procedures that can maximize the initiative's ability to produce equitable and socially sensitive outcomes. Our analysis can also be applied to other population-based, precision medicine research programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.