Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28748917›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2017

Oesophageal cancer.

Elizabeth C Smyth, Jesper Lagergren, Rebecca C Fitzgerald, Florian Lordick, Manish A Shah, Pernilla Lagergren, David Cunningham

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 631 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
631citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
47.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

631 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,058 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Lactylation Modification and Esophageal Cancer: Research Progress From Hypoxia-Induced Metabolic Reprogramming to Immune Escape.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

571 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Elizabeth C SmythDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK.
Jesper LagergrenDivision of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK.
Rebecca C FitzgeraldMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Florian LordickUniversity Cancer Center Leipzig, University Medicine Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Manish A ShahSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Pernilla LagergrenSurgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
David CunninghamDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SELeipzig University · DEMRC Cancer Unit · GBNew York Hospital Queens · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15874Cancer Research UK A15874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oesophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide and is therefore a major global health challenge. The two major subtypes of oesophageal cancer are oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), which are epidemiologically and biologically distinct. OSCC accounts for 90% of all cases of oesophageal cancer globally and is highly prevalent in the East, East Africa and South America. OAC is more common in developed countries than in developing countries. Preneoplastic lesions are identifiable for both OSCC and OAC; these are frequently amenable to endoscopic ablative therapies. Most patients with oesophageal cancer require extensive treatment, including chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and/or surgical resection. Patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal cancer are treated with palliative chemotherapy; those who are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive may also benefit from trastuzumab treatment. Immuno-oncology therapies have also shown promising early results in OSCC and OAC. In this Primer, we review state-of-the-art knowledge on the biology and treatment of oesophageal cancer, including screening, endoscopic ablative therapies and emerging molecular targets, and we discuss best practices in chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, surgery and the maintenance of patient quality of life.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAfrica, EasternAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyEndoscopy, Digestive SystemErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID28748917
PMCPMC6168059
OpenAlexW4210685329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.