Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28748572›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2018

Let's chat: developmental neural bases of social motivation during real-time peer interaction.

Katherine Rice Warnell, Eleonora Sadikova, Elizabeth Redcay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An Active-Inference Approach to Second-Person Neuroscience.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Peer facilitation of emotion regulation in adolescence.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine Rice WarnellDepartment of Psychology, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3694-7952
Eleonora SadikovaDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Elizabeth RedcayDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
University of Maryland, College Park · USTexas State University · US

Funding

Brain Network Dynamics Contributing to Atypical Social Interaction in AutismR01MH107441 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI REDCAY, ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans are motivated to interact with each other, but the neural bases of social motivation have been predominantly examined in non-interactive contexts. Understanding real-world social motivation is of special importance during middle childhood (ages 8-12), a period when social skills improve, social networks grow, and social brain networks specialize. To assess interactive social motivation, the current study used a novel fMRI paradigm in which children believed they were chatting with a peer. The design targeted two phases of interaction: (1) Initiation, in which children engaged in a social bid via sharing a like or hobby, and (2) Reply, in which children received either an engaged ("Me too") or non-engaged ("I'm away") reply from the peer. On control trials, children were told that their answers were not shared and that they would receive either engaged ("Matched") or non-engaged ("Disconnected") replies from the computer. Results indicated that during Initiation and Reply, key components of reward circuitry (e.g., ventral striatum) were more active for the peer than the computer trials. In addition, during Reply, social cognitive regions were more activated by the peer, and this social cognitive specialization increased with age. Finally, the effect of engagement type on reward circuitry activation was larger for social than non-social trials, indicating developmental sensitivity to social contingency. These findings demonstrate that both reward and social cognitive brain systems support real-time social interaction in middle childhood. An interactive approach to understanding social reward has implications for clinical disorders, where social motivation is more affected in real-world contexts.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentInterpersonal RelationsPeer GroupBrainBrain MappingChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationRewardSocial BehaviorSocial SkillsVentral Striatum

Identifiers

PMID28748572
PMCPMC7060940
OpenAlexW2737382676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.