ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2017
Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh.
Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04480073 (Customized CAD/CAM Titanium Meshes for the Guided Bone Regeneration of Severe Alveolar Ridge Defects), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Customized CAD/CAM Titanium Meshes for the Guided Bone Regeneration of Severe Alveolar Ridge Defects: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Clinical Follow-up Study in Humans
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of engineered scaffolds for horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of periodontology · 2026Pooled it
- The influence of hypoxia on tissue regeneration in oral and maxillofacial surgery - a systematic review.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison between CAD/CAM titanium mesh vs. conventional titanium mesh in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Pooled it
- Tooth shell versus bone shell technique for horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Complication, vertical bone gain, volumetric changes after vertical ridge augmentation using customized reinforced PTFE mesh or Ti-mesh. A non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral implants research · 2024Trial
- Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with versus without resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral implants research · 2021Trial
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of the membrane composed of biodegradable polycaprolactone and polyglycolic acid layers in guided bone regeneration.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- [Clinical and histological evaluation of three-dimensional printing individualized titanium mesh for alveolar bone defect repair].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025Article
- Customized 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Scoping Review of Workflows, Technology, and Materials.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Larger Vertical Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Multicenter Comparative Analysis of Seven Surgical Techniques.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Risk factors for dehiscence in alveolar ridge augmentation using patient-specific titanium mesh: a retrospective analysis.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Article
- Customized Bone Regeneration-A Retrospective Clinical Follow-Up Study of the Aesthetic Outcome.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- Iliac crest vertical block grafts -placing outside or inside the bone contour: A cohort study.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2024Article
- Alveolar bone regeneration using a 3D-printed patient-specific resorbable scaffold for dental implant placement: A case report.Clinical oral implants research · 2024Article
- Customized 3D-Printed Mesh, Membrane, Bone Substitute, and Dental Implant Applied to Guided Bone Regeneration in Oral Implantology: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2024Review
- In vivo comparison of customized zirconia barriers in guided bone regeneration: An experimental study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Patient-specific beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold for customized alveolar ridge augmentation: a case report : Case Report: patient-specific β-TCP scaffold for alveolar ridge CBR.International journal of implant dentistry · 2024Article
- Horizontal GBR with anorganic equine bone combined with a customized titanium mesh.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Forged to heal: The role of metallic cellular solids in bone tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Advanced Techniques for Bone Restoration and Immediate Loading after Implant Failure: A Case Report.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe augmentation of the jaw has been and continues to be a sophisticated therapy in implantology. Modern CAD-CAM technologies lead to revival of old and established augmentation techniques such as the use of titanium mesh (TM) for bone augmentation. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of an individualized CAD-CAM-produced TM based on the CT/DVT-DICOM data of the patients for the first time.
methodsIn 17 patients, 21 different regions were augmented with an individualized CAD-CAM-produced TM (Yxoss CBR®, Filderstadt, Germany). For the augmentation, a mixture of autologous bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) or autologous bone alone was used. Reentry with explantation of the TM and simultaneous implantation of 44 implants were performed after 6 months. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative cone beam computed tomographies (CBCT) were performed to measure the gained bone height.
resultsThe success rate for the bone grafting procedure was 100%. Thirty-three percent of cases presented an exposure of the TM during the healing period. However, premature removal of these exposed meshes was not necessary. Exposure rate in augmentations performed with mid-crestal incisions was higher than in augmentations performed with a modified poncho incision (45.5 vs. 20%, p = 0.221). In addition, exposure rates in the maxilla were significantly higher than in the mandible (66.7 vs. 8.3%, p = 0.009). Gender, smoking, periodontal disease, gingiva type, used augmentation material, and used membrane had no significant influence on the exposure rate (p > 0.05). The mean vertical augmentation was 6.5 ± 1.7 mm, and the mean horizontal augmentation was 5.5 ± 1.9 mm. Implant survival rate after a mean follow-up of 12 ± 6 months after reentry was 100%.
conclusionWithin the limits of the retrospective character of this study, this study shows for the first time that individualized CAD-CAM TM provide a sufficient and safe augmentation technique, especially for vertical and combined defects. However, the soft tissue handling for sufficient mesh covering remains one of the most critical steps using this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.