Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28748514›Full record

SynthesisClinical rheumatology2018

A systemic review and meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of total glucosides of peony combined with methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis.

Zhi-Tao Feng, Juan Xu, Guo-Chao He, San-Jin Cai, Juan Li, Zhi-Gang Mei

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Combination of total glucosides of paeony, narrow-band ultraviolet B, and oral corticosteroid mini-pulse therapy for nonsegmental vitiligo: A retrospective study.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhi-Tao FengThird-Grade Pharmacological Laboratory on Chinese Medicine Approved by State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei, 443002, China.
Juan XuDepartment of Rheumatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Guo-Chao HeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hunan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuzhou, Hunan, 412008, China.
San-Jin CaiThird-Grade Pharmacological Laboratory on Chinese Medicine Approved by State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei, 443002, China.
Juan LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China. lj40038@126.com.
Zhi-Gang MeiThird-Grade Pharmacological Laboratory on Chinese Medicine Approved by State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei, 443002, China. meizhigang@ctgu.edu.cn.
China Three Gorges University · CNNanfang Hospital · CNShenzhen Zhongshan Urological Hospital · CN

Funding

Guangdong Science and Technology Program 2016A020226001Shenzhen Technology Innovation Foundation JCYJ20150401171352927the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation 2015A030310067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of total glucoside of peony (TGP) and methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Randomized controlled trial (RCT) data on the traditional Chinese active component TGP combined with MTX vs. MTX alone for the treatment of RA was collected by searching the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP Journals database, and Wanfang database up to February 2017. Study selection, data extraction, data synthesis, and data analyses were performed according to the Cochrane standards. A total of eight RCTs involving 522 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with MTX alone, the use of TGP combined with MTX exhibited better therapeutic effects for the treatment of RA (P = 0.004). In addition, TGP combined with MTX caused a more significant decrease in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (P < 0.0001) and swollen joint count (SJC) (P < 0.00001). However, no significant differences were found in C-reactive protein (CRP) (P = 0.19), duration of morning stiffness (DMS) (P = 0.32), or tender joint count (TJC) (P = 0.23) between the two groups. In addition, adverse events were more frequently reported in the MTX monotherapy group than in the TGP and MTX combination group (P = 0.0007). Our study demonstrates that TGP combined with MTX is more effective than MTX alone for the treatment of RA. Nevertheless, the adverse effects of the combination of TGP and MTX need to be further assessed. Due to the poor methodological quality of included trials, well-designed, multi-center, and large-scale RCTs are necessary to draw a more definitive conclusion.

Indexed as

PaeoniaAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDrug Therapy, CombinationGlucosidesHumansMethotrexatePhytotherapyPlant ExtractsTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsGlucosidesMethotrexatePlant ExtractsMeta-analysisMethotrexateRandomized controlled trialRheumatoid arthritisSystematic reviewTotal glucosides of peonyTraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID28748514
PMCPMC5754451
OpenAlexW2740588853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.