Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28748498›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2017

The value of explicitly emulating a target trial when using real world evidence: an application to colorectal cancer screening.

Xabier García-Albéniz, John Hsu, Miguel A Hernán

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in People With HIV.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xabier García-AlbénizDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. xabi@post.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9814-2343
John HsuMongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Miguel A HernánDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

Statistical Methods for the Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Social Disparities in CancerP01CA134294 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI DOMINICI, FRANCESCA, LIN, XIHONG · 2008 to 2017
$6.8M
Natural Experiment of Value-Based Incentives for Preventive ServicesR01HD075121 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HSU, JOHN · 2012 to 2016
$3.3M
Screening for Free: A Value-Based Insurance Design Natural ExperimentR01CA164023 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HSU, JOHN · 2012 to 2015
$2.4M
To Screen or Not To Screen: Prevention Decisions and Competing RisksR01HS023128 · AHRQ · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HSU, JOHN · 2014 to 2014
$399k
Evaluation of dynamic strategies of cancer careK99CA207730 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI GARCIA DE ALBENIZ, XABIER ADRIAN · 2017 to 2017
$137k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS023128NCI NIH HHS K99 CA207730NCI NIH HHS K99-CA207730NCI NIH HHS P01 CA134294NCI NIH HHS P01-CA134294NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164023NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075121NIH HHS R01-CA164023NIH HHS R01-HS023128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational analyses for causal inference often rely on real world data collected for purposes other than research. A frequent goal of these observational analyses is to use the data to emulate a hypothetical randomized experiment, i.e., the target trial, that mimics the design features of a true experiment, including a clear definition of time zero with synchronization of treatment assignment and determination of eligibility. We review a recent observational analysis that explicitly emulated a target trial of screening colonoscopy using insurance claims from U.S. Medicare. We then compare this explicit emulation with alternative, simpler observational analyses that do not synchronize treatment assignment and eligibility determination at time zero and/or do not allow for repeated eligibility. This empirical comparison suggests that lack of an explicit emulation of the target trial leads to biased estimates, and shows that allowing for repeated eligibility increases the statistical efficiency of the estimates.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerColorectal NeoplasmsComparative Effectiveness ResearchHumansMass ScreeningMedicareObservational Studies as TopicUnited StatesCausal inferenceColon cancer screeningTarget trial

Identifiers

PMID28748498
PMCPMC5759953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.