Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28748339›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2017

Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications: clinical practice guideline.

Evelien M Sandberg, Wouter J K Hehenkamp, Peggy M Geomini, Petra F Janssen, Frank Willem Jansen, Andries R H Twijnstra

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Safety and Effectiveness of G-MeshJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Evelien M SandbergSection Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6855-4470
Wouter J K HehenkampDepartment of Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peggy M GeominiDepartment of Gynecology, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Petra F JanssenDepartment of Gynecology, Elisabeth-Twee Steden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Frank Willem JansenSection Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Andries R H TwijnstraSection Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. a.r.h.twijnstra@lumc.nl.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSince the introduction of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery, the percentage of advanced laparoscopic procedures has greatly increased worldwide. It seems therefore, timely to standardize laparoscopic gynecologic care according to the principles of evidence-based medicine. With this goal in mind-the Dutch Society of Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery initiated in The Netherlands the development of a national guideline for laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). This present article provides a summary of the main recommendations of the guideline.

methodsThis guideline was developed following the Dutch guideline of medical specialists and in accordance with the AGREE II tool. Clinically important issues were firstly defined and translated into research questions. A literature search per topic was then conducted to identify relevant articles. The quality of the evidence of these articles was rated following the GRADE systematic. An expert panel consisting of 18 selected gynecologists was consulted to formulate best practice recommendations for each topic.

resultsTen topics were considered in this guideline, including amongst others, the different approaches for hysterectomy, advice regarding tissue extraction, pre-operative medical treatment and prevention of ureter injury. This work resulted in the development of a clinical practical guideline of LH with evidence- and expert-based recommendations. The guideline is currently being implemented in The Netherlands.

conclusionA guideline for LH was developed. It gives an overview of best clinical practice recommendations. It serves to standardize care, provides guidance for daily practice and aims to guarantee the quality of LH at an (inter)national level.

Indexed as

HysterectomyLaparoscopyFemaleHumansNetherlandsPractice Guidelines as TopicUterine DiseasesUterusAGREE II toolBest practiceClinical practice guidelineGRADE methodLaparoscopic hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID28748339
PMCPMC5548857
OpenAlexW2737628355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.