Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28748106›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2018

A feasibility study of a theory-based intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy for older people in primary care.

Cathal A Cadogan, Cristín Ryan, Gerard J Gormley, Jill J Francis, Peter Passmore, Ngaire Kerse, Carmel M Hughes

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04181879 (A Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of a Theory-based Intervention to Improve Appropriate Polypharmacy in Older People in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04181879 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of a Theory-based Intervention to Improve Appropriate Polypharmacy in Older People in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen's University, BelfastRan2019 to 2021Enrolled68ConditionsPolypharmacyArmsIntervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Cathal A CadoganSchool of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Cristín RyanSchool of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Gerard J GormleyDepartment of General Practice, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Jill J FrancisSchool of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.
Peter PassmoreCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Ngaire KerseSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Carmel M HughesSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IECity, University of London · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

The Dunhill Medical Trust R298/0513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA general practitioner (GP)-targeted intervention aimed at improving the prescribing of appropriate polypharmacy for older people was previously developed using a systematic, theory-based approach based on the UK Medical Research Council's complex intervention framework. The primary intervention component comprised a video demonstration of a GP prescribing appropriate polypharmacy during a consultation with an older patient. The video was delivered to GPs online and included feedback emphasising the positive outcomes of performing the behaviour. As a complementary intervention component, patients were invited to scheduled medication review consultations with GPs. This study aimed to test the feasibility of the intervention and study procedures (recruitment, data collection).

methodsGPs from two general practices were given access to the video, and reception staff scheduled consultations with older patients receiving polypharmacy (≥4 medicines). Primary feasibility study outcomes were the usability and acceptability of the intervention to GPs. Feedback was collected from GP and patient participants using structured questionnaires. Clinical data were also extracted from recruited patients' medical records (baseline and 1 month post-consultation). The feasibility of applying validated assessment of prescribing appropriateness (STOPP/START criteria, Medication Appropriateness Index) and medication regimen complexity (Medication Regimen Complexity Index) to these data was investigated. Data analysis was descriptive, providing an overview of participants' feedback and clinical assessment findings.

resultsFour GPs and ten patients were recruited across two practices. The intervention was considered usable and acceptable by GPs. Some reservations were expressed by GPs as to whether the video truly reflected resource and time pressures encountered in the general practice working environment. Patient feedback on the scheduled consultations was positive. Patients welcomed the opportunity to have their medications reviewed. Due to the short time to follow-up and a lack of detailed clinical information in patient records, it was not feasible to detect any prescribing changes or to apply the assessment tools to patients' clinical data.

conclusionThe findings will help to further refine the intervention and study procedures (including time to follow-up) which will be tested in a randomised pilot study that will inform the design of a definitive trial to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness.

trial registrationISRCTN18176245.

Indexed as

Behaviour changeFeasibilityGeneral practiceInterventionPolypharmacyPrescribingTheoretical Domains Framework

Identifiers

PMID28748106
PMCPMC5520366
OpenAlexW2736398917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.