Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28748001›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2017

A long-range interactive DNA methylation marker panel for the promoters of HOXA9 and HOXA10 predicts survival in breast cancer patients.

Seong-Min Park, Eun-Young Choi, Mingyun Bae, Jung Kyoon Choi, Youn-Jae Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Circulating methylatedOncology letters · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Alternative splicing of lncRNAs in human diseases.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Methylation inCells · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seong-Min Park *Translational Research Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi 10408 Republic of Korea.
Eun-Young Choi *Translational Research Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi 10408 Republic of Korea.
Mingyun BaeDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141 Republic of Korea.
Jung Kyoon ChoiDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141 Republic of Korea.
Youn-Jae KimTranslational Research Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi 10408 Republic of Korea.
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KRNational Cancer Center · KRKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost DNA cancer methylation markers are based on the transcriptional regulation of the promoter-gene relationship. Recently, the importance of long-range interactions between distal CpGs and target genes has been revealed. Here, we attempted to identify methylation markers for breast cancer that interact with distant genes.

resultsWe performed integrated analysis using chromatin interactome data, methylome data, transcriptome data, and clinical information for breast cancer from public databases. Using the chromatin interactome and methylome data, we defined CpG-distant target gene relationships. After determining the differences in methylation between tumor and paired normal samples, the survival association, and the correlation between CpG methylation and distant target gene expression, we selected CpG methylation marker candidates. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we combined the selected markers and evaluated the prognostic model. We identified six methylation markers in HOXA9 and HOXA10 promoter regions and their long-range target genes. We experimentally validated the chromatin interactions, methylation status, and transcriptional regulation. A prognostic model showed that the combination of six methylation markers was highly associated with poor survival in independent datasets. According to our multivariate analysis, the prognostic model showed significantly better prognostic ability than other histological and molecular markers.

conclusionsThe combination of long-range interacting HOXA9 and HOXA10 promoter CpGs predicted the survival of breast cancer patients, providing a comprehensive and novel approach for discovering new methylation markers.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationBreast NeoplasmsCpG IslandsEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHomeobox A10 ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMCF-7 CellsPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival AnalysisHomeobox A10 Proteinshomeobox protein HOXA9Homeodomain ProteinsHOXA10 protein, humanBiomarkerChromatin interactionDNA methylationHOXA10HOXA9Long-range interactionPrognosisSurvival

Identifiers

PMID28748001
PMCPMC5525292
OpenAlexW2738491383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.