ArticleImmunome research2011
A computational pipeline to generate MHC binding motifs.
Article in Immunome research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurement of MHC/peptide interactions by gel filtration or monoclonal antibody capture.Current protocols in immunology · 2013Article
- Advances in T-cell epitope engineering.Frontiers in immunology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMajor histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules play key roles in host immunity against pathogens by presenting peptide antigens to CD8+ T-cells. Many variants of MHC molecules exist, and each has a unique preference for certain peptide ligands. Both experimental approaches and computational algorithms have been utilized to analyze these peptide MHC binding characteristics. Traditionally, MHC binding specificities have been described in terms of binding motifs. Such motifs classify certain peptide positions as primary and secondary anchors according to their impact on binding, and they list the preferred and deleterious residues at these positions. This provides a concise and easily communicatable summary of MHC binding specificities. However, so far there has been no algorithm to generate such binding motifs in an automated and uniform fashion.
resultsIn this paper, we present a computational pipeline that takes peptide MHC binding data as input and produces a concise MHC binding motif. We tested our pipeline on a set of 18 MHC class I molecules and showed that the derived motifs are consistent with historic expert assignments.
conclusionsWe have implemented a pipeline that formally codifies rules to generate MHC binding motifs. The pipeline has been incorporated into the immune epitope database and analysis resource (IEDB) and motifs can be visualized while browsing MHC alleles in the IEDB.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.