Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28747666›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Comparative Analysis of Four Buckwheat Species Based on Morphology and Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequences.

Cheng-Long Wang, Meng-Qi Ding, Chen-Yan Zou, Xue-Mei Zhu, Yu Tang, Mei-Liang Zhou, Ji-Rong Shao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biotechnological Methods for Buckwheat Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The first complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  12. The Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequences of EightFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Comparative Analysis of two Sugarcane AncestorsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  18. International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  19. Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequences ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cheng-Long WangSchool of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan, 625014, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4655-866X
Meng-Qi DingSchool of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan, 625014, China.
Chen-Yan ZouSchool of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan, 625014, China.
Xue-Mei ZhuSchool of Resources and Environment, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China.
Yu TangDepartment of Tourism Culture, Sichuan Higher Institute of Cuisine, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610072, China.
Mei-Liang ZhouBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China. zhoumeiliang@caas.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-5175-3684
Ji-Rong ShaoSchool of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan, 625014, China. shaojr007@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buckwheat is a nutritional and economically crop belonging to Polygonaceae, Fagopyrum. To better understand the mutation patterns and evolution trend in the chloroplast (cp) genome of buckwheat, and found sufficient number of variable regions to explore the phylogenetic relationships of this genus, two complete cp genomes of buckwheat including Fagopyrum dibotrys (F. dibotrys) and Fagopyrum luojishanense (F. luojishanense) were sequenced, and other two Fagopyrum cp genomes were used for comparative analysis. After morphological analysis, the main difference among these buckwheat were height, leaf shape, seeds and flower type. F. luojishanense was distinguishable from the cultivated species easily. Although the F. dibotrys and two cultivated species has some similarity, they different in habit and component contents. The cp genome of F. dibotrys was 159,320 bp while the F. luojishanense was 159,265 bp. 48 and 61 SSRs were found in F. dibotrys and F. luojishanense respectively. Meanwhile, 10 highly variable regions among these buckwheat species were located precisely. The phylogenetic relationships among four Fagopyrum species based on complete cp genomes was showed. The results suggested that F. dibotrys is more closely related to Fagopyrum tataricum. These data provided valuable genetic information for Fagopyrum species identification, taxonomy, phylogenetic study and molecular breeding.

Indexed as

Genome, ChloroplastGenomicsDNA, ChloroplastFagopyrumFlowersGenetic VariationPhylogenyPlant LeavesSeedsSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Chloroplast

Identifiers

PMID28747666
PMCPMC5529468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.