ArticleScientific reports2017
Porcine familial adenomatous polyposis model enables systematic analysis of early events in adenoma progression.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Butyrylated Starch on Bowel Polyps in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Results of a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Trial
- The significance of CEACAM60, a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) homolog, as a tumor antigen in the porcine cancer model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Unveiling regulatory variants in the blood transcriptome and their association with immunity traits in pigs.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Overview of research progress and application of experimental models of colorectal cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Identification of transcriptional regulatory variants in pig duodenum, liver, and muscle tissues.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Swine models for translational oncological research: an evolving landscape and regulatory considerations.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022Review
- Use of Translational, Genetically Modified Porcine Models to Ultimately Improve Intestinal Disease Treatment.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Review
- Wild-type APC Influences the Severity of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022Article
- Allelic Expression Imbalance Analysis IdentifiedCancers · 2021Article
- Beyond tradition and convention: benefits of non-traditional model organisms in cancer research.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2021Review
- A protease-activated, near-infrared fluorescent probe for early endoscopic detection of premalignant gastrointestinal lesions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Genetically Engineered Pigs to Study Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Biodegradable fluorescent nanoparticles for endoscopic detection of colorectal carcinogenesis.Advanced functional materials · 2019Article
- Elevated expression of p53 in early colon polyps in a pig model of human familial adenomatous polyposis.Journal of applied genetics · 2018Article
- Identification of endogenous microRNA references in porcine serum for quantitative real-time PCR normalization.Molecular biology reports · 2018Article
- Genetically engineered pigs as models for human disease.Disease models & mechanisms · 2018Review
- Altered microRNA profiles during early colon adenoma progression in a porcine model of familial adenomatous polyposis.Oncotarget · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compared gene expression in low and high-grade intraepithelial dysplastic polyps from pigs carrying an APC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.