Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28747656›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Modification of the contact surfaces for improving the puncture resistance of laminar structures.

Pengfei Wang, Jinglei Yang, Xin Li, Mao Liu, Xin Zhang, Dawei Sun, Chenlu Bao, Guangfa Gao, Mohd Yazid Yahya, Songlin Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pengfei WangCAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230027, China.
Jinglei YangDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China. maeyang@ust.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-9413-9016
Xin LiCollege of Mechanics, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030024, China.
Mao LiuDepartment of Materials Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
Xin ZhangSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Dawei SunSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Chenlu BaoSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Guangfa GaoSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Mohd Yazid YahyaCentre for Composite, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, 81310, Malaysia.
Songlin XuCAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230027, China. SLXu99@ustc.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncovering energy absorption and surface effects of various penetrating velocities on laminar structures is essential for designing protective structures. In this study, both quasi-static and dynamic penetration tests were systematical conducted on the front surfaces of metal sheets coated with a graphene oxide (GO) solution and other media. The addition of a GO fluid film to the front impact surface aided in increasing the penetration strength, improving the failure extension and dissipating additional energy under a wide-range of indentation velocity, from 3.33 × 10

Identifiers

PMID28747656
PMCPMC5529432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.