Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28747472›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Disentangling sources of variation in SSU rDNA sequences from single cell analyses of ciliates: impact of copy number variation and experimental error.

Chundi Wang, Tengteng Zhang, Yurui Wang, Laura A Katz, Feng Gao, Weibo Song

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Identification and Genotyping ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Integrative studies on three new freshwaterMarine life science & technology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chundi WangInsititute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, People's Republic of China.
Tengteng ZhangInsititute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, People's Republic of China.
Yurui WangInsititute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, People's Republic of China.
Laura A KatzDepartment of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063, USA.
Feng GaoInsititute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, People's Republic of China gaof@ouc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9395-0125
Weibo SongInsititute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, People's Republic of China.
Ocean University of China · CNQingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology · CNSmith College · US

Funding

Evolution of germline/soma distinctions across the eukaryotic tree of lifeR15GM113177 · NIGMS · SMITH COLLEGE · PI KATZ, LAURA ALINE · 2015 to 2015
$262k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM113177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) is widely used for phylogenetic inference, barcoding and other taxonomy-based analyses. Recent studies indicate that SSU rDNA of ciliates may have a high level of sequence variation within a single cell, which impacts the interpretation of rDNA-based surveys. However, sequence variation can come from a variety of sources including experimental errors, especially the mutations generated by DNA polymerase in PCR. In the present study, we explore the impact of four DNA polymerases on sequence variation and find that low-fidelity polymerases exaggerate the estimates of single-cell sequence variation. Therefore, using a polymerase with high fidelity is essential for surveys of sequence variation. Another source of variation results from errors during amplification of SSU rDNA within the polyploidy somatic macronuclei of ciliates. To investigate further the impact of SSU rDNA copy number variation, we use a high-fidelity polymerase to examine the intra-individual SSU rDNA polymorphism in ciliates with varying levels of macronuclear amplification:

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsCiliophoraDNA, RibosomalPhylogenyScientific Experimental ErrorSingle-Cell AnalysisDNA, Ribosomalciliophorapolymerase fidelityquantitative polymerase chain reactionrDNA copy numberrDNA polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID28747472
PMCPMC5543213
OpenAlexW2736502090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.