ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2017
Rapid Detection of Bacillus anthracis Bloodstream Infections by Use of a Novel Assay in the GeneXpert System.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A simple and sensitive test forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- The Biosafety Research Road Map: The Search for Evidence to Support Practices in the Laboratory-Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2023Review
- Article
- Review of anthrax: A disease of farm animals.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2022Review
- Biodefence research two decades on: worth the investment?The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2021Review
- Clinically Important Toxins in Bacterial Infection: Utility of Laboratory Detection.Clinical microbiology newsletter · 2020Article
- Multiplex Detection of Three Select Agents Directly from Blood by Use of the GeneXpert System.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Article
- Confronting the threat of bioterrorism: realities, challenges, and defensive strategies.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.