Trial reportImplementation science : IS2017
Implementation findings from a hybrid III implementation-effectiveness trial of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A Multilevel Diabetes and CVD Risk Reduction Intervention in African American Churches: Project Faith Influencing Transformation (FIT) Feasibility and Outcomes.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2020Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a virtual quality improvement training program to improve reach of weight management programs within a large health system.Health services research · 2024Trial
- Findings from an Organizational Context Survey to Inform the Implementation of a Collaborative Care Study for Co-occurring Disorders.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2024Trial
- Costing a population health management approach for participant recruitment to a diabetes prevention study.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Trial
- Interaction of diabetes genetic risk and successful lifestyle modification in the Diabetes Prevention Programme.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2021Trial
- The LEAP Program: Quality Improvement Training to Address Team Readiness Gaps Identified by Implementation Science Findings.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Trial
- A Cluster-Randomized Study of Technology-Assisted Health Coaching for Weight Management in Primary Care.Annals of family medicineTrial
- Start-Up and Implementation Costs for a Community-Based Culturally Tailored Diabetes Prevention Program.Journal of prevention (2022) · 2026Article
- Considerations for Cost Assessment of Implementing Family Healthy Weight Programs Across Community and Clinical Contexts.Childhood obesity (Print) · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in Health Settings: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2026Review
- From evidence to action: contextual determinants for the pre-implementation of a foot-ankle exercise program for diabetes in primary care.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Building readiness in community-based organisations to enable the implementation of public health interventions for adults and older adults: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Key determinants in implementation processes: a systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).Implementation science communications · 2025Review
- The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) User Guide: a five-step guide for conducting implementation research using the framework.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Virtual Diabetes Prevention Program Tailored to Increase Participation of Black and Latino Men: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Expanding methods to address RE-AIM metrics in hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Testing effectiveness and implementation of a standardized approach to sexual dysfunction screening among adolescent and young adult-aged survivors of childhood cancer: A type I hybrid, mixed methods trial protocol: Effectiveness of sexual dysfunction screening among AYA cancer survivors: a study protocol.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Integrating the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) into a Culturally Responsive Evaluation (CRE) Approach to Conduct Mixed-Method Evaluations of Diabetes Prevention and Management Programs Reaching Underresourced Populations and Communities.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024Article
- Implementation of the Diabetes Prevention Program in Georgia Cooperative Extension According to RE-AIM and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is an effective lifestyle intervention to reduce incidence of type 2 diabetes. However, there are gaps in knowledge about how to implement DPP. The aim of this study was to evaluate implementation of DPP via assessment of a clinical demonstration in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
methodsA 12-month pragmatic clinical trial compared weight outcomes between the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Prevention Program (VA-DPP) and the usual care MOVE!® weight management program (MOVE!). Eligible participants had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m
resultsSeveral barriers and facilitators to Reach, Adoption, Implementation, Effectiveness and Maintenance were identified; barriers related to Reach were the largest challenge encountered by site teams. Fidelity was higher for VA-DPP delivery compared to MOVE! for five of seven domains assessed. Participant satisfaction was high in both programs, but higher in VA-DPP for most items. Based on micro-costing methods, cost of assessment for eligibility was $68/individual assessed, cost of scheduling and maintaining adherence was $328/participant, and cost of delivery was $101/session.
conclusionsMulti-faceted strategies are needed to reach targeted participants and successfully implement DPP. Costs for assessing patients for eligibility need to be carefully considered while still maximizing reach to the targeted population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.