Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28747169›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2017

Optimising decision making on illness absenteeism due to fever and common infections within childcare centres: development of a multicomponent intervention and study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

K K B Peetoom, R Crutzen, J M H A Bohnen, R Verhoeven, H J M G Nelissen-Vrancken, B Winkens, G J Dinant, J W L Cals

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K K B PeetoomCare and Public Health Research Institute Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. kirsten.peetoom@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
R CrutzenCare and Public Health Research Institute, Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J M H A BohnenCare and Public Health Research Institute Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
R VerhoevenCare and Public Health Research Institute Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
H J M G Nelissen-VranckenDutch Institute for Rational Use of Medicine, P.O. Box 3089, 3502, GB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
B WinkensCare and Public Health Research Institute, Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
G J DinantCare and Public Health Research Institute Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J W L CalsCare and Public Health Research Institute Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLInstituut voor Verantwoord Medicijngebruik · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence has shown that children 0-4 year-old attending childcare are prone to acquire infections compared to children cared for at home, with fever being the most common symptom. Illness absenteeism due to fever and common infections is substantial and mostly driven by unrealistic concerns and negative attitude towards fever of both childcare staff and parents, resulting in illness absenteeism from childcare, work absenteeism among parents and healthcare service use. The objective of this study is to optimise decision making among childcare staff on illness absenteeism due to fever and common infections in childcare. Underlying determinants of behavioural change were targeted by means of a multicomponent intervention.

methodsA multicomponent intervention was developed to improve decision making, using the stepwise approach of Intervention Mapping, and in close collaboration with stakeholders and experts. The intervention consisted of 1) a two-hour educational session on fever among childcare staff; 2) an online video for childcare staff and parents emphasising key information of the educational session; 3) a decision tool for childcare staff and parents in the format of a traffic light system to estimate the severity of illness and corresponding advices for childcare staff and parents; 4) an information booklet regarding childhood fever, common infections, and self-management strategies for childcare staff and parents. The multicomponent intervention will be evaluated in a cluster randomised trial with a 12-week follow-up period and absenteeism due to illness (defined as the percentage of childcare days absent due to illness on the total of childcare days during a 12-week period) as primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures are: incidence rate and duration of illness episodes, knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy, and risk perception on fever and common infections of childcare staff and parents, healthcare service use in general and paracetamol use, and work absenteeism of parents. DISCUSSION: This study aims to develop a multicomponent intervention and to evaluate to what extent illness absenteeism due to fever and common infections can be affected by implementing a multicomponent intervention addressing decision making and underlying determinants among childcare staff and parents of children attending daycare.

trial registrationNTR6402 (registered on 21-apr-2017).

Indexed as

AbsenteeismDecision MakingChild CareChild, PreschoolCommunicable DiseasesFeverHumansInfantInservice TrainingPamphletsParentsResearch DesignSelf EfficacySeverity of Illness IndexChildcare centresCommon infectionsFeverIllness absenteeismIntervention mapping

Identifiers

PMID28747169
PMCPMC5530501
OpenAlexW2738582220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.