Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28747160›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017

Adverse events in women and children who have received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis treatment: a systematic review.

Farah Seedat, Chris Stinton, Jacoby Patterson, Julia Geppert, Bee Tan, Esther R Robinson, Noel Denis McCarthy, Olalekan A Uthman, Karoline Freeman, Samantha Ann Johnson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in pregnant women with group BFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Group BJournal of Korean medical science · 2025
    Article
  9. Early-onset group B streptococcal infections in five Nordic countries with different prevention policies, 1995 to 2019.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Significant shifts in the distribution of vaccine capsular polysaccharide types and rates of antimicrobial resistance of perinatal group B streptococci within the last decade in St. Petersburg, Russia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Farah SeedatDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Chris StintonDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Jacoby PattersonDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Julia GeppertDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Bee TanDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Esther R RobinsonBirmingham Public Health Laboratory (PHE), Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
Noel Denis McCarthyDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Olalekan A UthmanDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Karoline FreemanDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Samantha Ann JohnsonDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Hannah FraserDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Colin Stewart BrownBacteria Reference Department, National Infection Service, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Ave, London, NW95EQ, UK.
Aileen ClarkeDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Sian Taylor-PhillipsDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. S.Taylor-Phillips@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1841-4346
University of Warwick · GBHeartlands Hospital · GBHeart of England NHS Foundation Trust · GBPublic Health England · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2016-09-018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse events from intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) are poorly documented yet essential to inform clinical practice for neonatal group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease prevention. In this systematic review, we appraised and synthesised the evidence on the adverse events of IAP in the mother and/or her child.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Science Citation Index from date of inception until October 16th 2016. Reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews were hand-searched. We included primary studies in English that reported any adverse events from intrapartum antibiotics for any prophylactic purpose compared to controls. The search was not restricted to prophylaxis for GBS but excluded women with symptoms of infection or undergoing caesarean section. Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of studies, using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomised Studies. Results were synthesised narratively and displayed in text and tables.

resultsFrom 2364 unique records, 30 studies were included. Despite a wide range of adverse events reported in 17 observational studies and 13 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), the evidence was inconsistent and at high risk of bias. Only one RCT investigated the long-term effects of IAP reporting potentially serious outcomes such as cerebral palsy; however, it had limited applicability and unclear biological plausibility. Seven observational studies showed that IAP for maternal GBS colonisation alters the infant microbiome. However, study populations were not followed through to clinical outcomes, therefore clinical significance is unknown. There was also observational evidence for increased antimicrobial resistance, however studies were at high or unclear risk of bias.

conclusionsThe evidence base to determine the frequency of adverse events from intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for neonatal GBS disease prevention is limited. As RCTs may not be possible, large, better quality, and longitudinal observational studies across countries with widespread IAP could fill this gap.

trial registrationCRD42016037195 .

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisCerebral PalsyFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPregnancyStreptococcal InfectionsTherapeutic IrrigationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAdverse eventsGroup B StreptococcusHarmsIntrapartum antibiotic prophylaxisStreptococcus agalactiaeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28747160
PMCPMC5530570
OpenAlexW2736598628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.