ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2017
Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stem Cell-Based Tissue Engineering for Cleft Defects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2024Pooled it
- Stem Cell-Based Regenerative Approaches for the Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate: A Comprehensive Review.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Review
- New insight into biodegradable macropore filler on tuning mechanical properties and bone tissue ingrowth in sparingly dissolvable bioceramic scaffolds.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- TyroFill-Titanium Implant Constructs for the Coordinated Repair of Rabbit Mandible and Tooth Defects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing Bioceramic Scaffolds Using Direct-Ink-Writing for Craniomaxillofacial Bone Regeneration.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2023Review
- Use of stem cells in bone regeneration in cleft palate patients: review and recommendations.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2022Review
- Sources, Characteristics, and Therapeutic Applications of Mesenchymal Cells in Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Review
- Construction of a Pig Alveolar Cleft Model in Imitation of Cleft Lip and Palate Congenital Deformity.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2022Article
- Predifferentiated Gingival Stem Cell-Induced Bone Regeneration in Rat Alveolar Bone Defect Model.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2021Article
- An overview of de novo bone generation in animal models.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021Review
- Use of Human Dental Pulp and Endothelial Cell Seeded Tyrosine-Derived Polycarbonate Scaffolds for RobustFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Dipyridamole-loaded 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds stimulate pediatric bone regeneration in vivo without disruption of craniofacial growth through facial maturity.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Functional organic cation transporters mediate osteogenic response to metformin in human umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells.Cytotherapy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Alveolar (gumline) clefts are the most common congenital bone defect in humans, affecting 1 in 700 live births. Treatment to repair these bony defects relies on autologous, cancellous bone transfer from the iliac crest. This harvest requires a second surgical site with increased surgical time associated with potential complications, while providing only limited cancellous bone. Improvements in treatment protocols that avoid these limitations would be beneficial to patients with clefts and other craniofacial bone defects. There have been steady advances in tissue-engineered (TE) solutions for long-bone defects and adult patients, but advances for the pediatric craniofacial skeleton have been slower to emerge. This study utilizes a previously established juvenile swine model with a surgically created, critical size alveolar defect to test the efficacy of umbilical cord (UC) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) treatments on nano-microfiber scaffolds. At 1 month after implanting our TE construct, mineralized tissue in the surgical gap was quantified through computed tomography (CT), and histology, and excised tissue was subjected to mechanical testing. Both undifferentiated and predifferentiated (toward an osteogenic lineage) UC MSCs generated bone within the cleft on a scale comparable to iliac crest cancellous bone, as evidenced by histology and CT scans. All of the pigs treated with scaffold/stem cell combinations had mineralized tissue within the defect, although without filling the entire defect. Several of the experimental animals exhibited poor and/or asymmetric maxillary growth 1 month after the initial surgery, especially if the surgical defect was located on the smaller side of an already asymmetric pig. Our results demonstrate that tissue engineering approaches using UC MSCs are a promising alternative for repair of the alveolar cleft. Data in the pig model demonstrate that implanted scaffolds are at least as good as the current gold standard treatment based on harvesting cancellous bone from the iliac crest, regardless of whether the cells seeded on the scaffold are precommitted to an osteogenic fate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.