Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28747097›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2017

Montserrat Caballero, Donna C Jones, Zhengyuan Shan, Sajjad Soleimani, John A van Aalst

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stem Cell-Based Tissue Engineering for Cleft Defects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Use of stem cells in bone regeneration in cleft palate patients: review and recommendations.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An overview of de novo bone generation in animal models.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Montserrat CaballeroDivision of Plastic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Donna C JonesDivision of Plastic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Zhengyuan ShanDivision of Plastic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sajjad SoleimaniDivision of Plastic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
John A van AalstDivision of Plastic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

UNC Clinical Translation Science Award-K12 Scholars Program (KL2)KL2TR000084 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2012 to 2013
$2.3M
Large Animal Model for Novel Autologous Treatments of Alveolar CleftsK08DE023124 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VAN AALST, JOHN ANANDA · 2012 to 2015
$529k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000084NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE023124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alveolar (gumline) clefts are the most common congenital bone defect in humans, affecting 1 in 700 live births. Treatment to repair these bony defects relies on autologous, cancellous bone transfer from the iliac crest. This harvest requires a second surgical site with increased surgical time associated with potential complications, while providing only limited cancellous bone. Improvements in treatment protocols that avoid these limitations would be beneficial to patients with clefts and other craniofacial bone defects. There have been steady advances in tissue-engineered (TE) solutions for long-bone defects and adult patients, but advances for the pediatric craniofacial skeleton have been slower to emerge. This study utilizes a previously established juvenile swine model with a surgically created, critical size alveolar defect to test the efficacy of umbilical cord (UC) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) treatments on nano-microfiber scaffolds. At 1 month after implanting our TE construct, mineralized tissue in the surgical gap was quantified through computed tomography (CT), and histology, and excised tissue was subjected to mechanical testing. Both undifferentiated and predifferentiated (toward an osteogenic lineage) UC MSCs generated bone within the cleft on a scale comparable to iliac crest cancellous bone, as evidenced by histology and CT scans. All of the pigs treated with scaffold/stem cell combinations had mineralized tissue within the defect, although without filling the entire defect. Several of the experimental animals exhibited poor and/or asymmetric maxillary growth 1 month after the initial surgery, especially if the surgical defect was located on the smaller side of an already asymmetric pig. Our results demonstrate that tissue engineering approaches using UC MSCs are a promising alternative for repair of the alveolar cleft. Data in the pig model demonstrate that implanted scaffolds are at least as good as the current gold standard treatment based on harvesting cancellous bone from the iliac crest, regardless of whether the cells seeded on the scaffold are precommitted to an osteogenic fate.

Indexed as

OsteogenesisAlveolar ProcessAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaDisease Models, AnimalElastic ModulusGreen Fluorescent ProteinsImaging, Three-DimensionalMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationSwineTissue EngineeringTomography, X-Ray ComputedUmbilical CordGreen Fluorescent Proteinsalveolar cleft surgeryanimal modelcell differentiationmesenchymal stem cellsnanocomposite scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID28747097
PMCPMC5734164
OpenAlexW2739709873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.