Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28746857›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Enhancing Irreversible Electroporation by Manipulating Cellular Biophysics with a Molecular Adjuvant.

Jill W Ivey, Eduardo L Latouche, Megan L Richards, Glenn J Lesser, Waldemar Debinski, Rafael V Davalos, Scott S Verbridge

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Differential effect of high-frequency electroporation on myocardium vs. non-myocardial tissues.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Normal and fibrotic liver parenchyma respond differently to irreversible electroporation.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jill W IveyLaboratory for Integrative Tumor Ecology, Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Eduardo L LatoucheBioelectromechanical Systems Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Megan L RichardsLaboratory for Integrative Tumor Ecology, Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Glenn J LesserBrain Tumor Center of Excellence, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Waldemar DebinskiBrain Tumor Center of Excellence, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Rafael V DavalosBioelectromechanical Systems Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences, Blacksburg, Virginia; Brain Tumor Center of Excellence, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Scott S VerbridgeLaboratory for Integrative Tumor Ecology, Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences, Blacksburg, Virginia; Brain Tumor Center of Excellence, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Electronic address: sverb@vt.edu.
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USVirginia Tech - Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences · US

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
High-frequency Irreversible Electroporation (H-FIRE) combinatorial GBM treatmentR01CA213423 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI DAVALOS, RAFAEL VIDAL, VERBRIDGE, SCOTT S · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Targeted electric field therapy for malignant infiltrative gliomaR21CA192042 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI DAVALOS, RAFAEL VIDAL, SANO, MICHAEL BENJAMIN · 2015 to 2016
$386k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA012197NCI NIH HHS R01 CA213423NCI NIH HHS R21 CA192042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed electric fields applied to cells have been used as an invaluable research tool to enhance delivery of genes or other intracellular cargo, as well as for tumor treatment via electrochemotherapy or tissue ablation. These processes involve the buildup of charge across the cell membrane, with subsequent alteration of transmembrane potential that is a function of cell biophysics and geometry. For traditional electroporation parameters, larger cells experience a greater degree of membrane potential alteration. However, we have recently demonstrated that the nuclear/cytoplasm ratio (NCR), rather than cell size, is a key predictor of response for cells treated with high-frequency irreversible electroporation (IRE). In this study, we leverage a targeted molecular therapy, ephrinA1, known to markedly collapse the cytoplasm of cells expressing the EphA2 receptor, to investigate how biophysical cellular changes resulting from NCR manipulation affect the response to IRE at varying frequencies. We present evidence that the increase in the NCR mitigates the cell death response to conventional electroporation pulsed-electric fields (∼100 μs), consistent with the previously noted size dependence. However, this same molecular treatment enhanced the cell death response to high-frequency electric fields (∼1 μs). This finding demonstrates the importance of considering cellular biophysics and frequency-dependent effects in developing electroporation protocols, and our approach provides, to our knowledge, a novel and direct experimental methodology to quantify the relationship between cell morphology, pulse frequency, and electroporation response. Finally, this novel, to our knowledge, combinatorial approach may provide a paradigm to enhance in vivo tumor ablation through a molecular manipulation of cellular morphology before IRE application.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesBiomechanical PhenomenaCell DeathCell Line, TumorCell SizeCoculture TechniquesCollagenElectromagnetic FieldsElectroporationEphrin-A1Finite Element AnalysisGliomaHumansHydrogelsMembrane PotentialsCollagenEphrin-A1HydrogelsReceptor, EphA2

Identifiers

PMID28746857
PMCPMC5529610
OpenAlexW2737628352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.