ReviewAnnual review of vision science2017
Binocular Mechanisms of 3D Motion Processing.
Review in Annual review of vision science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Binocular vs. monocular 3D cues in multiple object tracking: expertise differences between soccer players and non-athletes.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025Article
- A Normative Account of 3D Motion Perception from Natural Scenes.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Continuous psychophysics: past, present, future.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
- Optimal Estimation of Local Motion-in-Depth with Naturalistic Stimuli.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Continuous psychophysics shows millisecond-scale visual processing delays are faithfully preserved in movement dynamics.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Hierarchical computation of 3D motion across macaque areas MT and FST.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Walking humans and running mice: perception and neural encoding of optic flow during self-motion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Do you hear what I see? How do early blind individuals experience object motion?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- A binocular synaptic network supports interocular response alignment in visual cortical neurons.Neuron · 2022Article
- Retinal optic flow during natural locomotion.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Perspective Cues Make Eye-specific Contributions to 3-D Motion Perception.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2021Article
- Perceptual judgments of duration of parabolic motions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- On the Aperture Problem of Binocular 3D Motion Perception.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Asymmetries between achromatic and chromatic extraction of 3D motion signals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Eye-specific pattern-motion signals support the perception of three-dimensional motion.Journal of vision · 2019Article
- Contributions of binocular and monocular cues to motion-in-depth perception.Journal of vision · 2019Article
- Speed change discrimination for motion in depth using constant world and retinal speeds.PloS one · 2019Article
- A Riemannian Geometry Theory of Three-Dimensional Binocular Visual Perception.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Investigating Human Visual Sensitivity to Binocular Motion-in-Depth for Anti- and De-Correlated Random-Dot Stimuli.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Rapid assessment of natural visual motion integration across primate species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The visual system must recover important properties of the external environment if its host is to survive. Because the retinae are effectively two-dimensional but the world is three-dimensional (3D), the patterns of stimulation both within and across the eyes must be used to infer the distal stimulus-the environment-in all three dimensions. Moreover, animals and elements in the environment move, which means the input contains rich temporal information. Here, in addition to reviewing the literature, we discuss how and why prior work has focused on purported isolated systems (e.g., stereopsis) or cues (e.g., horizontal disparity) that do not necessarily map elegantly on to the computations and complex patterns of stimulation that arise when visual systems operate within the real world. We thus also introduce the binoptic flow field (BFF) as a description of the 3D motion information available in realistic environments, which can foster the use of ecologically valid yet well-controlled stimuli. Further, it can help clarify how future studies can more directly focus on the computations and stimulus properties the visual system might use to support perception and behavior in a dynamic 3D world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.