Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28746136›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2017

Using Organizational Philosophy to Create a Self-Sustaining Compensation Plan Without Harming Academic Missions.

Robert Leverence, Richard Nuttall, Rachel Palmer, Mark Segal, Alicia Wood, Fay Yancey, Jonathon Shuster, Mark Brantly, Robert Hromas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Financial Models for an Academic Practice in Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
  3. Imposter Syndrome and the Peer-Review Crisis.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robert LeverenceR. Leverence is professor and vice chair, Department of Medicine, and chief, Division of Hospital Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida Health, and director of utilization review, Shands Teaching Hospital, Gainesville, Florida.R. Nuttall is chief financial officer, School of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.R. Palmer is vice chair for administration, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Florida.M. Segal is professor and chief, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, and co-vice chair for research, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Florida.A. Wood is chief financial officer, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Florida.F. Yancey is chief operating officer, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Florida.J. Shuster is professor, Departments of Health Outcomes and Policy, and Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Research Design Program, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, and biostatistician, College of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Florida.M. Brantly is professor and chief, Division of Pulmonary, Sleep and Critical Care Medicine, and co-vice chair for research, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Florida.R. Hromas is professor and chair, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Florida.
Richard Nuttall
Rachel Palmer
Mark Segal
Alicia Wood
Fay Yancey
Jonathon Shuster
Mark Brantly
Robert Hromas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemAcademic physician reimbursement has moved to productivity-based compensation plans. To be sustainable, such plans must be self-funding. Additionally, unless research and education are appropriately valued, faculty involved in these efforts will become disillusioned, yet revenue generation in these activities is less robust than for clinical care activities. APPROACH: Faculty at the Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, elected a committee of junior and senior faculty and division chiefs to restructure the compensation plan in fiscal year (FY) 2011. This committee was charged with designing a new compensation plan based on seven principles of organizational philosophy: equity, compensation coupled to productivity, authority aligned with responsibility, respect for all academic missions, transparency, professionalism, and self-funding in each academic mission. OUTCOMES: The new compensation plan was implemented in FY2013. A survey administered at the end of FY2015 showed that 61% (76/125) of faculty were more satisfied with this plan than the previous plan. Since the year before implementation, clinical relative value units per faculty increased 7% (from 3,458 in FY2012 to 3,704 in FY2015, P < .002), incentives paid per faculty increased 250% (from $3,191 in FY2012 to $11,153 in FY2015, P ≤ .001), and publications per faculty increased 15% (from 2.6 in FY2012 to 3.0 in FY2015, P < .001). Grant submissions, external funding, and teaching hours also increased per faculty but did not reach statistical significance. NEXT STEPS: An important next step will be to incorporate quality metrics into the compensation plan, without affecting costs or throughput.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAdultEducation, MedicalEfficiency, OrganizationalFaculty, MedicalFemaleFloridaHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrganizational CultureOrganizational InnovationPhysician Incentive PlansSalaries and Fringe Benefits

Identifiers

PMID28746136
PMCPMC5526431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.